False-Memory Syndrome

THE MEMORY THAT NEVER WAS

False Memory Syndrome in Psychextrics Perspective

__________

OMOLAJA MAKINEE

THE MEMORY THAT NEVER WAS

Copyright © 2025 by OMOLAJA MAKINEE

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission from the author.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface

Introduction: Memory as a Psychextrics Construct

Part I: Mapping the Syndrome

Chapter 1: The Formation of False Memory: Neuroscience and Narrative

Chapter 2: Remission and Relapse: The Lifecycle of FMS

Part II: Psychextric Frameworks

Chapter 3: The Neurotype-Emotion Nexus: Psychextrics Roots of FMS

Chapter 4: Identity Formation And Reality Anchoring in Psychextrics

Part III: The Creative Mind and Constructive Delusion

Chapter 5: FMS as a Portal to Hypervisualisation

Chapter 6: Mnemonic Artistry: Drawing from Non-Experience

Part IV: Management, Healing, and Empowerment

Chapter 7: Therapeutic Anchoring: Tools to Separate Fact from Fiction

Chapter 8: Mindscaping: Psychextrics Interventions for Memory Correction

Part V: The Future of Memory and Psychextrics

Chapter 9: The Psychextrics Map of Memory: A New Diagnostic Frontier

Chapter 10: Education, Justice, And Social Implications of FMS

CONCLUSION: Memory Sovereignty And the Future of Psychextrics

PREFACE

False Memory Syndrome (FMS) is a condition that lives in the shadows of cognition, blurring the line between reality and fabrication. It confounds clinicians, bewilders families, and raises disturbing ethical questions. At its most tragic, it causes real harm—when people believe in events that never occurred and narrate it with certainty. But what if these same mechanisms also open portals into untapped human potential?

In this work, I approach FMS not just as a disorder, but as a window into the psyche’s constructive processes—what we call psychextrics. A term derived from the fusion of psyche and extrication, psychextrics explores how behavioural and emotional traits, often linked to neurological wiring, give rise to complex human patterns, including those mistaken for pathology.

This book seeks not only to define and diagnose FMS, but to liberate its deeper meanings. We offer a model of understanding that embraces both the burdens and the gifts of false memory, recognising that every distortion of the mind may contain a key to understanding its deeper logic.

INTRODUCTION

MEMORY AS A PSYCHEXTRICS CONSTRUCT

Memory is often mistaken for a recording device—a camera that captures events and plays them back unchanged. But science, and life, teach us otherwise. Our memories are reconstructions, shaped by perception, emotion, suggestion, and time. In some individuals, this construction process becomes so vivid and compelling that it births memories that never happened—yet feel no less real. This is False Memory Syndrome.

FMS typically surfaces in early childhood, when children begin telling elaborate stories about events that did not occur. These narratives are often dismissed as imagination, yet they may signal a psychextrics predisposition—where certain neuro-emotive typologies foster a hyperconstructive memory function. In some, FMS retreats as the child matures. In others, it slumbers, awaiting a trigger—usually a major life event—before reactivating in adolescence or adulthood.

More than a psychiatric curiosity, FMS poses serious social and legal implications. It can be deliberately manipulated: a vulnerable person subjected to repetitive false narratives may begin to “remember” what never occurred. Entire identities can be shaped around implanted fabrications, especially when those memories are traumatic.

Yet, alongside the risk lies potential. On the FMS spectrum are individuals who possess extraordinary abilities—remarkable visual recall, lifelike artistic talent, or uncanny facial memory. These “creative distortions” are not merely byproducts; they may represent an adaptive or even gifted form of neural architecture.

This book charts a new course—integrating the clinical, the creative, and the ethical—by reframing FMS within the broader behavioural science of psychextrics. It proposes not only new diagnostics and therapeutic pathways, but a reorientation of our understanding of memory itself—as something constructed, editable, and, in some cases, artistically generative.

In the chapters ahead, I investigate both the liabilities and the possibilities of this condition—offering a balanced, humanistic, and psychextrics lens to illuminate one of the most misunderstood phenomena in cognitive science.

CHAPTER 1

THE FORMATION OF FALSE MEMORY: NEUROSCIENCE AND NARRATIVE

False memory is not an error—it is an act of authorship. The brain does not merely store memory like a passive container; it writes it, edits it, re-writes it, and sometimes invents entire scenes from fragments of meaning. When this process becomes habitual or dysregulated, we enter the territory of False Memory Syndrome (FMS)—a phenomenon as neurobiological as it is narratological.

The Constructive Nature

Of Memory

To understand false memory, we must first accept a radical but evidence-supported proposition: All memory is false to some degree. From the moment a lived experience enters the mind, it is filtered through the brain’s emotional and perceptual systems. This encoding process is influenced by hormones, attention, trauma, and meaning-making schemas. The hippocampus and amygdala—centres of memory and emotional processing—do not reproduce reality; they translate it.

Neurologically, memory is reconstructive. Research in cognitive neuroscience shows that recalling an event activates not only the hippocampus (responsible for memory consolidation) but also the prefrontal cortex, which governs imagination, reasoning, and future planning. This overlap means memory and imagination are not neurologically distinct—they are intertwined.

In individuals with FMS, this reconstructive function becomes dominant, with imagination seeping into memory channels, especially under emotional arousal or suggestive influence. The line between “what happened” and “what was felt” dissolves, and a narrative truth takes the place of a factual one.

Neurobiological Correlates

Of FMS

Several neurological signatures have been observed in individuals with a predisposition to false memory. These include:

• Increased activity in the default mode network (DMN) during memory tasks, suggesting a higher level of internal simulation and narrative construction.
• Atypical connectivity between the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex, which may impair the reality-monitoring system responsible for distinguishing imagination from perception.
• Greater right-hemisphere dominance, associated with visual-spatial imagery and holistic, non-linear memory construction.

Moreover, certain neurochemical conditions—particularly elevated cortisol during trauma or dopamine imbalances linked to fantasy proneness—may create fertile ground for distorted memory formation. In psychextrics terms, these patterns form part of a neurotype-emotion construct, where memory is sculpted not by what occurred, but by what the emotional body perceived by and in itself and needed to believe.

The Narrative

Compulsion

Humans are not just experiencers of life—we are narrators. The psyche craves coherence, and when gaps exist in memory, the mind fills them in. This is especially true in children, whose cognitive systems are still developing, and whose imaginative faculties are hyperactive. A child who misremembers a trip to the beach as including a shark encounter may be signalling not deception, but an emergent psychextrics pattern: one where the emotional symbolism (fear, excitement, attention-seeking) overrides sensory reality.

Narrative construction becomes the mechanism by which the self maintains identity continuity. In FMS, this narrative system becomes overactive, often in response to trauma, neglect, or internal conflict. A person unconsciously invents memories that explain pain, justify behaviour, or attract validation. The fabricated memory becomes a psychological placeholder—a fiction that feels more emotionally true than reality itself.

Memory Implants

And External Suggestion

False memories are not always internally generated. Research by Loftus and others (Loftus, E. F., & Pickrell, J. E. (1995) has demonstrated how easy it is to implant memories through suggestion. A person can be told repeatedly that they were lost in a mall as a child, and eventually “recall” the details of the incident, including smells, emotions, and the appearance of strangers.

This external encoding exploits the brain’s memory plasticity, especially in individuals with high suggestibility quotient—a trait found more frequently in the FMS spectrum.

Over time, repetition reinforces the neural pathways that support the false memory. What began as imagination becomes encoded as truth. Psychextrics interprets this as a reinforced misalignment between neurotype memory circuits and emotional imprinting, where the brain begins to confuse internal narrative with sensory memory due to persistent emotional reinforcement.

Emotional Anchoring

And the Role of Affect

Emotion is the glue of memory. It determines what we remember, how we remember it, and how vividly we recall it. In FMS, emotional anchoring plays a central role. A false memory may feel overwhelmingly real because it carries genuine emotional weight—even if the event never occurred.

For example, a person may “remember” being rejected by a parent, not because it happened in any literal sense, but because they felt unloved over time. The mind, seeking coherence, may construct a specific memory (e.g., being left alone at a school play) to symbolise and justify that emotional truth.

This creates a condition we call Emotive-Experiential Misalignment—a central psychextrics category in FMS diagnosis. It is not the event that creates trauma, but the feeling that searches for an event to explain itself. FMS may thus be understood as the psyche’s way of retroactively constructing a myth to house a wound.

The Seeds

In Childhood

Most cases of FMS begin in childhood, where early expressions of the syndrome are often mistaken for imagination, lying, or fantasy-proneness. A child who tells detailed stories of being kidnapped, witnessing events, or having a different family, may not be hallucinating but developing a coping mechanism—an alternative narrative to manage emotional incongruities in their environment.

Over time, such tendencies may diminish as the frontal cortex matures and reality-filtering improves. But in some individuals, the narrative circuits remain active and can be re-triggered by adult trauma, stress, or even therapeutic suggestion. This recurrence suggests that FMS, rather than a fixed disorder, is better understood as a latent narrative syndrome—a sleeping author within the psyche, capable of rewriting the self-story under pressure.

Memory

As Manuscript

False memory is not merely a dysfunction; it is a function gone awry—a result of the brain’s extraordinary ability to imagine, narrate, and emotionally encode experience. Psychextrics invites us to view FMS not through the lens of pathology alone, but through the broader behavioural architecture of the mind—a dynamic script-writing organ that constructs the self in language, image, and emotion.

The formation of false memory, then, is not an aberration, but an evolutionary feature misdirected. It teaches us how memory is less like a filing cabinet and more like a canvas—layered, painted over, scraped back, and revised with each new feeling, each new frame. The memory that never was can still feel true. And that truth, whether dangerous or beautiful, is what we must learn to understand.

DIAGNOSING THE INVISIBLE: CHILDHOOD MANIFESTATIONS

False Memory Syndrome (FMS) often makes its first appearance not in adulthood, but in the early terrain of childhood—where imagination, emotion, and identity are still learning how to coexist. The earliest signs are subtle, elusive, and easily mistaken for mischief or fantasy. Yet, within these early distortions lie the roots of a psychextrics pattern—one where memory does not mirror the world but reshapes it in response to inner need.

This section explores how FMS manifests in children, how it can be clinically distinguished from ordinary imaginative play or pathological deceit, and how psychextrics provides new tools to decode and interpret these memory distortions within a broader neuro-emotional typology.

Childhood:

The Mind Before Fact and Fiction Divide

Children are not born with a clear boundary between reality and imagination. Until around age seven, the prefrontal cortex—the brain’s centre for logic, critical evaluation, and self-regulation—is still immature. This makes children especially prone to fantasy integration, where pretend scenarios are emotionally internalised as if they were lived experience.

In early childhood, the brain does not prioritise factual memory over narrative coherence. A child’s psyche seeks meaning more than accuracy. It builds stories that resonate emotionally, even if they contradict observable facts. In this stage, memory is not a storage of truth, but a symbolic mirror of emotion.

Some degree of fabricated or distorted memory is therefore developmentally normal. What distinguishes a child with emerging FMS is not merely the existence of false narratives, but their frequency, specificity, emotional conviction, and resistance to correction.

The Signature Traits

Of Childhood-Onset FMS

When viewed through the lens of psychextrics, childhood-onset FMS reveals a pattern of behaviour and emotional processing that reflects a specific neurotype-emotion matrix. The traits often include:

1. Hyper-narration: The child compulsively tells elaborate, emotionally charged stories—often involving danger, abandonment, or complex social plots.
2. Memory Inflexibility: Even when confronted with clear evidence to the contrary, the child insists the false event occurred. The emotional intensity overrides logic.
3. Dream-Memory Confusion: Dreams are recalled and reported as real events, often merging seamlessly with waking life.
4. Victim Positioning: Many false memories position the child as the wronged party—suggesting an unmet emotional need is being expressed symbolically.
5. Visual Specificity: False memories are often highly visual and sensorial, showing detailed recall of faces, objects, and settings that were never part of lived experience.
6. Impressionability: The child is unusually sensitive to suggestion, especially from authority figures. They may “absorb” stories and later repeat them as personal history.

In psychextrics typology, such children often fall within a neuro-emotive spectrum that features high empathic sensitivity, heightened fantasy-proneness, and low cognitive anchoring—the latter referring to reduced executive filtering of incoming memory suggestions.

Common Contexts

For FMS Emergence in Children

FMS in children does not arise in isolation. It usually emerges within emotional or environmental contexts that trigger the mind’s need to fabricate coherence. Common triggers include:

• Parental Neglect or Emotional Inconsistency: Children exposed to emotionally absent or unpredictable caregivers may develop false memories that dramatise rejection or abandonment as a way to “explain” the emotional void.
• Overactive Discipline Environments: In overly strict households, children may craft false confessions or fabrications as survival tools, often internalising guilt that then reappears later in distorted autobiographical memories.
• Trauma or Exposure to Adult Themes: Children exposed to trauma, abuse, or premature adult narratives (e.g., sexual content, family secrets) may subconsciously incorporate these into their own memory constructs.
• Sibling Rivalry and Attention Dynamics: A child who feels overshadowed may unconsciously generate stories that elevate their importance, including false memories of harm, specialness, or danger.

In all these cases, the false memory becomes a psycho-symbolic compensation—a narrative substitute for an emotional reality that cannot be articulated directly.

Distinguishing FMS

From Pathological Lying and Fantasy Play

It is crucial to differentiate between false memory syndrome, pathological lying (pseudologia fantastica), and normal imaginative play. Each has its own psychological architecture:

• Fantasy Play is voluntary, usually shared with others, and has clear boundaries. The child knows it is pretend.
• Pathological Lying is often manipulative, compulsive, and serves a social or emotional goal. It may include conscious deceit.
• False Memory Syndrome involves sincerely believed falsehoods, often recalled with emotional distress or conviction. The child believes the memory is real, not constructed.

A key diagnostic indicator is the affective signature—how emotionally tied the child is to the false narrative. FMS memories often cause visible distress, fear, sadness, or anxiety, suggesting they are emotionally anchored rather than simply fabricated.

Neuro-psychextrics Markers

And Early Screening

From a psychextrics standpoint, early diagnosis of FMS requires observing the interaction between emotional triggers, memory behaviour, and narrative patterning. Useful indicators include:

• Thematic Repetition: Recurrent false memories that follow a symbolic pattern (e.g., abandonment, injury, disappearance).
• Vivid Recall of Non-Events: Memories that include sensorial detail (smells, textures, facial features) of events that have no corroborating evidence.
• Resistance to Correction: When new evidence fails to overwrite the memory and instead increases emotional attachment to it.
• Emotionally-Driven Confabulation: When the narrative serves an unmet need (e.g., needing to feel special, wronged, heroic).
• Imaginal Recall with Artistic Expression: Some children express their false memories through detailed drawings or stories, indicating a hypervisualisation pattern.

Such patterns point to a child not merely misremembering, but constructing emotionally-driven narrative experiences, a hallmark of the psychextrics false memory profile.

Case Snapshot:

“I Remember the Fire”

At age six, Ama began telling school staff that she had once escaped a house fire and was rescued by firemen. She described the flames in vivid detail, the heat on her skin, and the colour of the firefighter’s helmet. Her parents, alarmed, confirmed no such event ever occurred.

Ama’s narrative continued for months, even under questioning. Eventually, it was discovered that she had overheard her grandmother recounting a fire that occurred in a neighbouring village—years before she was born. Ama had absorbed the story, internalised it, and reconstructed it as her own memory.

But why this story? Further interviews revealed that Ama often felt invisible at home, especially after her baby brother was born. The fire narrative placed her at the centre of drama, danger, and rescue—a symbolic plea to be seen and saved. Her mind created not a lie, but a myth to house her emotional wound.

The Ethical Terrain

Of Early Intervention

Diagnosing FMS in children requires sensitivity. False memories, even if fabricated, are not to be dismissed or mocked. To the child, they are real. Invalidating them can cause deeper fractures in identity. The goal is not to disprove memory, but to understand why the memory exists.

Early intervention should involve:

• Narrative Therapy: Helping the child reframe the emotional truth of the memory without reinforcing the false event.
• Reality Anchoring: Gently guiding the child to test and observe what is verifiable and what may be imagined.
• Emotional Validation: Acknowledging the feeling without affirming the false event.
• Parent Education: Teaching caregivers not to overreact or punish but to explore the child’s emotional cues and unmet needs.

Psychextrics assessment tools can be used to map the child’s neurotype, emotional variance, and narrative style, offering a tailored support strategy.

The Myth-Maker

Child

The child with FMS is not a liar, nor merely a dreamer. They are a myth-maker—weaving emotional truths into remembered fictions. Their memories, though factually inaccurate, are often metaphorically precise. They are trying to say something they cannot yet articulate: “I hurt,” “I need to matter,” “I am afraid,” “See me.”

Early FMS is a signal—an invisible code embedded in a story. If we listen not just for the facts, but for the feelings behind them, we can begin to translate these false memories into healing. In doing so, we open the door to a psychextrics future where the child’s narrative is neither condemned nor confirmed, but gently re-authored toward truth.

CHAPTER 2

REMISSION AND RELAPSE: THE LIFECYCLE OF FMS

False Memory Syndrome (FMS) is not a static condition, nor is it neatly linear in its development. Like many syndromes that arise at the intersection of emotion, memory, and cognition, FMS unfolds in cycles. There are periods of remission, where memory distortion recedes or stabilises, and there are periods of relapse, when old narratives reawaken or new ones are constructed with renewed conviction.

This chapter examines the life-course trajectory of FMS—from childhood through adolescence to adulthood—through a psychextrics lens. It investigates what triggers dormancy, what reignites false memory episodes, and how the syndrome’s evolution can be mapped across time and emotional development.

Understanding Remission:

Dormancy, Not Cure

In clinical terms, remission refers to the temporary reduction or disappearance of symptoms. In FMS, remission does not mean the complete erasure of false memories, but rather a diminished salience or influence of these memories in the person’s daily life and identity.

In many individuals diagnosed with early FMS, symptoms seem to fade in late childhood or adolescence. Stories once told with vivid certainty are no longer repeated. Emotional distress linked to false memories lessens. The individual may stop speaking of those memories altogether.

However, psychextrics warns us not to mistake this for healing in the traditional sense. What we see here is narrative dormancy—the mind has not abandoned the false memory; it has simply de-prioritised its utility. The emotional terrain may have stabilised, relationships may have improved, or the internal need that gave rise to the memory may have been replaced by other psychological mechanisms.

The memory remains—like an inactive script filed away—waiting for emotional conditions to call it back to stage.

The Psychextrics Cycles

Of FMS

Based on case studies and behavioural mapping, FMS appears to follow a four-phase cyclical pattern across the individual’s lifespan:

1. Initial Manifestation: Often in childhood, marked by highly emotional, symbolic false memories.
2. Suppression or Dormancy: Typically during adolescence or early adulthood, when cognitive filters and social adaptation skills strengthen.
3. Triggering Event or Narrative Disruption: A life event (trauma, loss, confrontation, therapy, conflict) causes memory structures to destabilise.
4. Relapse or Narrative Reformation: False memories resurface, often updated or embellished, accompanied by renewed emotional conviction.

This cycle may repeat multiple times throughout a person’s life, particularly during psychologically vulnerable periods such as grief, divorce, spiritual crisis, childbirth, or aging.

The Role of Life Events

As Catalysts

False memories do not exist in a vacuum. They are sensitive to the context of lived experience. In psychextrics, external events are seen not as causes of memory relapse, but as activators of dormant symbolic scripts.

A woman who falsely remembers abuse in childhood may experience a resurgence of that memory after becoming a mother herself—not because she has remembered something long buried, but because the emotional terrain (fear, protection, shame) reactivates a narrative constructed long ago.

Similarly, individuals who undergo therapy or hypnosis may “recover” memories that are later proven to be false. In these cases, the therapeutic setting itself becomes a narrative amplifier, especially in suggestible neurotypes.

Common relapse triggers include:

• Death of a parent or caregiver;
• Marital breakdown or betrayal;
• Spiritual awakening or identity crisis;
• Exposure to media depicting similar traumas;
• Group therapy or highly suggestive environments;
• Legal disputes or inheritance conflicts;
• Illness and facing mortality.

These events may not implant new memories—they unearth dormant ones, often reshaped to align with the present emotional narrative.

Memory Revision

vs Memory Return

A crucial distinction in the psychextrics understanding of relapse is between memory return and memory revision.

• Memory Return: The reappearance of a previously held false memory, often in its original emotional form.
• Memory Revision: A reconstructed or modified version of the original false narrative, now adapted to fit new emotional or relational needs.

For instance, a man who falsely “remembered” being excluded from family holidays as a child may, upon entering therapy, revise the memory to include neglect, abuse, or even conspiracy. The memory becomes more detailed over time, not because it is accurate, but because the psyche is drawing on deeper emotional material.

In psychextrics terms, this process is akin to narrative neuroplasticity—the mind rewriting its own biography to achieve emotional symmetry.

The Shadow of Shame

And the Identity Loop

Relapse in FMS is often accompanied by shame, confusion, and cognitive dissonance. Individuals may feel emotionally attached to a memory that others deny. This can create ruptures in relationships and even lead to social isolation. The person’s self-concept becomes entangled with a memory that is psychologically central but factually absent.

In severe cases, this results in what psychextrics calls the Identity Loop: the individual re-validates their own memory through behavioural re-enactment, emotional rumination, or confrontation with others. The false memory is no longer a private experience—it becomes an identity position.

This is particularly evident when the false memory is of victimisation. While the individual may have experienced real emotional neglect or harm, the specific remembered event becomes the anchor for that narrative, and letting go of the memory feels like denying the pain altogether.

This emotional entrapment creates a kind of psychological feedback loop:

• Memory reinforces identity;
• Identity depends on narrative;
• Narrative resists contradiction;
• Contradiction leads to collapse.

Thus, the false memory must remain—not because of deception, but because of emotional necessity.

Partial Recovery

And Compensatory Identity

Some individuals, with therapeutic support or self-realisation, reach a stage of partial recovery. They acknowledge that the memory may be distorted or untrue, but they do not dismiss its emotional reality. In psychextrics, this is seen as the beginning of compensatory identity formation—where a new, more truthful narrative is consciously constructed to replace the symbolic one.

For example, instead of holding onto a false memory of abuse, the individual may say: “I realise now that I wasn’t abused in that way, but I did feel emotionally unsafe, and that’s what my mind was trying to express.”

This level of narrative maturity marks a profound shift: from unconscious fabrication to conscious authorship of memory. It does not erase the past but rewrites its meaning with clarity and compassion.

Therapeutic Caution

In the Lifecycle

Understanding the cyclical nature of FMS requires clinicians, therapists, and caregivers to exercise extreme caution. Missteps during remission or relapse can deepen the syndrome. The following practices are advised:

• Avoid binary language (“That never happened” vs. “You’re remembering it now”) and instead validate the emotional message of the memory.
• Identify symbolic patterns in the person’s memory, looking for psychological needs rather than historical truths.
• Introduce the concept of memory as narrative early in therapy, helping the individual explore alternative emotional explanations.
• Use expressive therapies (drawing, writing, visualisation) to allow the false memory to externalise and evolve into a new symbolic form.
• Recognise relapse as emotional regression, not manipulation or regression to pathology.

In psychextrics, the therapist’s role is not to confirm or deny memory—but to decode it, identify its symbolic source, and help the individual reconstruct a story that affirms their pain while restoring their connection to reality.

Time, Memory,

And the Shape of the Self

False Memory Syndrome does not disappear—it morphs. It rises and recedes like tide, depending on the weather of the soul. Its lifecycle is not defined by certainty but by emotional readiness, psychic vulnerability, and the mind’s ceaseless desire to explain itself.

Understanding FMS as a cyclical, narrative-emotional syndrome offers us more than diagnostic clarity. It offers compassion. It reminds us that memory is not a prison of truth but a canvas of meaning. In remission, we breathe. In relapse, we listen. And in both, we learn how the self seeks not only to remember—but to matter.

THE SPECTRUM OF FALSE MEMORY: FROM MILD CONFABULATION

TO COGNITIVE DISTORTION

False memory is not a singular experience. It lives along a spectrum—a wide, fluid continuum that ranges from harmless embellishments and imaginative insertions to deep-rooted distortions that rewrite personal history.

In psychextrics, this spectrum is not just a measure of severity, but of function. It reflects the varying roles that false memory plays in the construction, protection, and adaptation of the self.

In this chapter, we map the spectrum of false memory across clinical, cognitive, and psychextrics dimensions—offering a model that moves beyond binary thinking (true vs. false) and into a more nuanced understanding of how memory operates as a behavioural and emotional survival mechanism.

The Myth

Of the Memory Binary

Most people think of memory in binary terms: either it happened, or it didn’t. Either it’s true, or it’s a lie. This thinking is both overly simplistic and clinically unhelpful. Memory is not an objective recording; it is a reconstructive and interpretative process, always shaped by emotion, perception, suggestion, and context.

What differentiates normal memory variation from false memory syndrome is not the existence of distortion—it is the function, frequency, emotional valence, and resistance to correction of those distortions.

In psychextrics analysis, we divide the false memory spectrum into five overlapping categories:

1. Mild Confabulation;
2. Embellished Recall;
3. Symbolic Substitution;
4. Affective Imprint Distortion;
5. Cognitive Identity Distortion (CID).

Let us examine each stage in turn.

1. Mild Confabulation: Filling in the Gaps:

Confabulation refers to the unconscious process by which the brain fills in gaps in memory with plausible but inaccurate details. It is common in both healthy individuals and those with neurological impairments.

Examples:

• Believing you left your keys on the table when you actually placed them on the couch.
• Misremembering the order of events in a story.
• Recalling a conversation that never happened but “feels” like it did.

These false memories are usually:

• Low in emotional charge;
• Easily corrected with evidence;
• Not central to one’s identity.

From a psychextrics view, confabulation is an adaptive neurofunction—the brain’s way of maintaining narrative continuity when sensory data is incomplete. It is a benign glitch in the neuro-emotional loop, typically requiring no clinical intervention.

2. Embellished Recall: When Memory Seeks Significance:

At this level, memory distortion begins to reflect an emotional or social need. The individual may unintentionally exaggerate or dramatise real events, adding imagined details or symbolic enhancements.

Examples:

• Recalling that a teacher “yelled” at you when they only raised their voice.
• Remembering a childhood incident as more dangerous or dramatic than it was.
• Recasting oneself as the hero or victim in retellings of past events.

These embellished memories are:

• Often semi-conscious or habitual;
• Reinforced through repeated narration;
• Linked to attention, self-esteem, or significance.

Psychextrics interprets this behaviour as emotive-narrative augmentation—where the memory is shaped to reflect the identity the person wishes to project. The story becomes a psychological mirror, offering coherence, validation, or sympathy.

3. Symbolic Substitution: Emotional Truth Replaces Factual Truth:

In symbolic substitution, the individual creates a false memory that represents an underlying emotional truth. The memory is no longer merely exaggerated; it is invented—often unconsciously—to make sense of unresolved feelings, trauma, or unmet needs.

Examples:

• A person “remembers” being abandoned in a store as a child, though records show they were never alone.
• A woman insists she was verbally abused by a partner in ways that align with internalised guilt or low self-worth, though the language was never used.
• A teenager claims their parent “never hugged them,” despite evidence of affectionate parenting—symbolising a perceived emotional absence.

These memories:

• Feel intensely real;
• Are emotionally anchored;
• Resist rational disconfirmation;
• May be metaphorically accurate but historically false.

Symbolic substitution is central to mid-spectrum FMS. In psychextrics, it signals a neuro-emotional structure where internal affective states dictate the content of memory. These individuals are not deceiving others; they are decoding pain through narrative construction.

4. Affective Imprint Distortion: Memory as Trauma Echo:

At the more serious end of the spectrum is affective imprint distortion, where the emotional residue of trauma or chronic stress contaminates multiple memory systems. The person begins to retroactively interpret past events in ways that serve the current emotional state.

Examples:

• A veteran falsely remembering being ambushed in a combat zone they never entered.
• An adult “recalling” being locked in a closet by a parent, though no such event occurred—symbolising years of feeling emotionally stifled.
• A person with depression reconstructing their childhood as entirely joyless, despite objective indicators of warmth and care.

Here, emotion becomes the architect of reality, rewriting memory to match present affect. In psychextrics diagnostics, this stage represents the tipping point between functional adaptation and clinical distortion.

Characteristics:

• Multi-memory contamination;
• Emotional flashbacks attached to invented scenes;
• Heightened suggestibility and reactivity;
• Often comorbid with trauma-spectrum disorders.

Treatment requires emotional recalibration, not fact correction. Attempting to disprove the memory without addressing the emotion that constructed it only deepens cognitive dissonance.

5. Cognitive Identity Distortion (CID): The Memory-Self Merger:

At the furthest point of the FMS spectrum lies Cognitive Identity Distortion—a psychextrics condition where false memories are fully integrated into the person’s core identity. These memories become defining truths that shape behaviour, worldview, and relationships.

Examples:

• An individual identifies as a victim of abuse that, upon forensic investigation, never occurred—but remains emotionally unable to detach from the memory.
• A person believes they were adopted or born into royalty, despite irrefutable genealogical evidence to the contrary.
• A client insists on a specific life-altering event (e.g., seeing someone die, witnessing a crime) that deeply shapes their personality and life choices—yet no such event occurred.

In CID:

• The memory is existential, not episodic;
• Contradiction is experienced as identity attack;
• The false narrative is protected by emotional logic;
• Disconfirmation may cause breakdown, rage, or emotional withdrawal.

This is the most clinically severe manifestation of FMS. CID requires deep therapeutic strategy—often using narrative therapy, identity reprocessing, expressive arts, and psychextrics reframing techniques to preserve emotional dignity while introducing memory flexibility.

The Spectrum

As an Adaptive Continuum

Rather than viewing the spectrum from “harmless” to “harmful,” psychextrics encourages us to see the continuum as an Adaptive Range:

Level	Function	Memory Role
Mild Confabulation	Data Completion	Narrative Coherence
Embellished Recall	Ego Maintenance	Self-Presentation
Symbolic Substitution	Emotional Resolution	Internal Expression
Affective Imprint Distortion	Trauma Processing	Safety Reconstruction
Cognitive Identity Distortion	Identity Preservation	Existential Anchoring

Each point on the spectrum serves a function, however distorted its form may become. False memory, in all its shades, reflects the mind’s determination to narrate itself into emotional balance—even at the cost of historical truth.

Psychextrics Typologies

Along the Spectrum

Certain neuro-emotive types are more susceptible to specific stages of false memory. For example:

• The Imaginative Integrator: Highly creative, emotionally sensitive, prone to symbolic substitution and vivid dream-memory blurring.
• The Echo Retainer: Trauma-exposed individuals with high affective imprinting; may experience spontaneous false memory flashbacks.
• The Narrative Idealist: Constructs embellished autobiographical tales to maintain positive self-image or moral identity.
• The Displacement Archivist: Stores emotional memories under surrogate events; often unaware of symbolic function.
• The Existential Autobiographer: Most vulnerable to CID; builds entire life-narratives around core false experiences.

Understanding these typologies allows clinicians to intervene with strategies that are neuro-emotionally aligned, not just factually corrective.

Embracing the Spectrum

With Compassion

The spectrum of false memory is not a descent into delusion—it is a roadmap of the soul’s coping mechanisms. At each point, memory serves a purpose: to protect, to explain, to feel, to connect, or to matter.

Psychextrics challenges us to move past the question “Did it happen?” and instead ask:

“What emotional purpose is this memory serving?”

“What symbolic truth does this distortion express?”

“How can we preserve dignity while restoring clarity?”

In this way, we begin to treat not the memory, but the meaning behind the memory. And in doing so, we offer those living with FMS not just correction—but understanding.

SUGGESTIBILITY AND THE MALICIOUS IMPLANT: ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN MEMORY MANIPULATION

In the tender architecture of memory, suggestion can act as either a gentle breeze or a violent storm. For individuals along the False Memory Syndrome (FMS) spectrum, suggestibility is not a weakness but a heightened openness—a neuro-emotive sensitivity to external narratives that can nourish healing or sow devastation.

This section confronts the ethical minefield of memory implantation, especially when suggestion is misused deliberately or negligently, resulting in long-term cognitive and emotional harm.

Psychextrics views suggestibility as both a trait and a state—partially innate, partially situational—whose effects are most visible when memory becomes the battleground for influence. Through clinical studies, historical patterns, and philosophical inquiry, we examine how malicious suggestion or unintentional therapeutic influence can implant false memories that become indistinguishable from genuine experience.

The Neurobiology

Of Suggestibility

At the neurological level, suggestibility is closely tied to:

• Theta wave dominance in certain cognitive states (e.g., hypnosis, early childhood).
• Limbic vulnerability, where emotionally charged stimuli are preferentially encoded.
• Neurochemical openness, including oxytocin and dopamine modulation, which heightens trust and receptivity.

Children, trauma survivors, and those with dissociative tendencies often show increased susceptibility to external cues. In these populations, imagination and memory share neural substrates, particularly within the medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex. This overlap creates a powerful, and sometimes dangerous, fusion: to imagine is to remember.

When Memory is Planted:

Case Studies in Implantation

Several classic experiments demonstrate the disturbing ease with which false memories can be implanted. In one widely cited study (Loftus & Pickrell, 1995), participants were told they had been lost in a mall as children. Though this event never happened, over 25% came to “remember” it in vivid, emotional detail—complete with imagined visuals, dialogue, and resolution.

In another instance, participants were falsely informed that they had once committed a minor crime. Through suggestive questioning, many began to confess—internalising the suggestion as real memory. The implications for criminal justice and therapeutic practice are profound.

But outside the lab, these phenomena become darker, more complex, and ethically urgent.

The Malicious Implant:

Weaponising Suggestion

Malicious implantation occurs when someone intentionally inserts a false narrative into another’s mind, often with a motive:

• To control behaviour;
• To punish or discredit;
• To rewrite shared history;
• To create dependency;
• To incriminate another.

Examples:

• A parent repeatedly tells a child they “used to run away,” though it never occurred—creating a self-image of rebellion or shame.
• A partner insists, over time, that the other once cheated, until that partner begins to feel guilt over a memory that never happened.
• A cult leader implants vivid but false memories of past lives, traumas, or missions to tighten psychological control.
• A law enforcement officer repeatedly implant narratives in a witness diagnose with FMS to incriminate the defendant with persistent phrase ‘Do you remember?” “Do you not remember?”

In psychextrics terms, this is narrative abuse—the hijacking of memory through emotional suggestion, repetition, and authority. The ethical violation is not just psychological; it is ontological, threatening the very structure of a person’s lived identity.

Therapeutic Suggestion:

When Help Becomes Harm

The line between healing and harm is especially thin in therapy. Therapeutic techniques that explore memory (e.g., regression, inner child work, trauma mapping) can lead to spontaneous false memory formation—especially if the therapist, consciously or not, signals what they “expect” to hear.

Dangers include:

• Leading questions (“Are you sure your uncle didn’t touch you inappropriately?”).
• Confirmation bias in interpretation of dreams or symptoms.
• Hypnotic suggestion of abuse or buried memories.
• Reinforcement of imagined events as catharsis.

Clients with high suggestibility—often trauma survivors or those seeking resolution—may generate false memories that feel real enough to restructure identity and alienate families. In such cases, the therapeutic space becomes a laboratory for identity distortion.

While repressed memories and trauma recall are legitimate clinical concerns, psychextrics ethics demand a rigorous neutrality and a focus on symbolic rather than literal truth. When symbolic pain is mistaken for historical fact, the result is often familial rupture, legal conflict, and deep personal confusion.

Consent, Power,

And the Moral Weight of Suggestion

At the heart of this issue lies the ethical principle of consent. Memory is not a blank canvas open to external painting. It is a sacred archive, and those who enter—whether as therapists, partners, or authority figures—carry great power.

Psychextrics frames suggestibility as an emotive-epistemic opening, which makes memory not only personal but participatory. Every time we narrate another’s past to them, we are shaping their sense of self. The ethical use of this power requires:

• Awareness of suggestive language;
• Respect for narrative agency;
• Caution in interpreting symbols as facts;
• Protection of emotional dignity even when correcting memory.

Suggestibility becomes unethical when:

• It violates autonomy;
• It prescribes experience rather than explores it;
• It overrides internal emotional logic with external imposition.

Gaslighting vs. Implantation:

Two Sides of Narrative Abuse

Gaslighting and memory implantation are psychological cousins. Both alter memory, but in opposite directions:

Form	Method	Goal
Gaslighting	Erasure of true memory	Undermine reality confidence
Implantation	Insertion of false memory	Reframe identity or control behaviour

Both exploit the same vulnerability—trust—and the same mechanism—suggestive repetition. Both can lead to confusion, emotional dependence, and dissociation.

In psychextrics diagnostics, prolonged exposure to either can create neuro-emotive restructuring, resulting in conditions like:

• FMS with CID (Cognitive Identity Distortion);
• Narrative Dissociation Disorder (NDD);
• Reactive Autobiographical Disorder (RAD).

Digital Suggestion

And Collective False Memory

In the internet age, malicious implantation is no longer interpersonal alone—it is also algorithmic and collective.

False memories can be seeded by:

• Viral misinformation;
• Altered photographs or deepfakes;
• Misquoted events;
• Manufactured consensus (bots, comment sections).

For those with latent FMS tendencies, repeated exposure to false narratives can lead to crowdsourced memory implantation—especially regarding political, racial, or personal identity histories.

One example is the Mandela Effect, where large groups recall events differently than what records show. While this often reflects harmless confabulation, in vulnerable individuals, it may lead to dissociative reality confusion, affecting trust in self and others.

Reversing the Implant:

Therapeutic Deconstruction

When a false memory is suspected to be implanted—whether maliciously or accidentally—intervention must proceed carefully. The goal is not to force reality, but to open interpretive space.

Psychextrics deconstruction involves:

1. Narrative Softening: Encouraging flexibility in how the memory is told.
2. Symbolic Translation: Identifying emotional truths behind imagined events.
3. Emotive Anchoring: Replacing false affect with authentic emotional context.
4. Boundary Rebuilding: Restoring the client’s sense of cognitive sovereignty.
5. Memory Ecology Repair: Reconnecting the client with validated memory networks.

Importantly, shaming the false memory only reinforces its hold. What is needed is a reweaving of memory—so that dignity is preserved even as clarity is restored.

Ethical Vigilance

In the Age of Narrative Vulnerability

The question is not whether people can be made to believe false memories. They can. The question is whether we, as a society—parents, partners, professionals—understand the sacred weight of narrative influence.

Psychextrics urges a new ethical code, built not just on truth but on empathy:

• Do not invade another’s past for your gain.
• Do not treat emotional metaphors as legal facts.
• Do not assume the role of narrator in someone else’s story.
• Always ask: Who benefits from this memory? Who is harmed by its implant?

False memory syndrome is not merely a clinical curiosity. It is a call to be witnesses, not authors, in the memory lives of others. Where suggestion walks, ethics must follow close behind.

CHAPTER 3

THE NEUROTYPE-EMOTION NEXUS: PSYCHEXTRICS ROOTS OF FMS

False Memory Syndrome (FMS), when viewed through the classical lens of neuropsychology, appears as a disruption of episodic recall, suggestibility, and narrative construction. But from the deeper, behaviouro-genetic perspective of psychextrics, FMS arises from a subtler and more intricate axis: the neurotype-emotion nexus.

This chapter marks the shift into a new model—one that reframes false memory not simply as error or pathology, but as the emotive byproduct of a neuro-emotional blueprint, shaped before language and even before conscious thought.

In psychextrics, all behavioural expressions—including memory distortion—are rooted in the interweaving of neurotype (the genetically influenced architecture of mental processing) and emotion-variant encoding (the individual’s affective response style).

Every neurotype is conceptualised as a behavioural algorithm—an emergent pattern of thought and action shaped by the unique interplay of thalamic wiring, cortical density, synaptic efficiency, and genetic expression. A neurotype is not merely a static “personality template” but an active operational mode of the brain’s perception–evaluation–response system. Within this model, the thalamus plays the pivotal role of gatekeeper and filter, deciding which sensory and interoceptive signals pass forward into conscious cortical processing.

Thalamic Emotional

Pre-Processing

Before information reaches the cortical lobes—where conscious reasoning and detailed reconstruction occur—the thalamus evaluates incoming data through its nuclei, weighting it for urgency, relevance, and affective tone. This means that even the raw perceptual experience is already emotionally “flavoured” before the conscious mind engages with it. In the case of FMS, this pre-processing step is critical because false but emotionally loaded signals can be granted the same urgency and relevance as accurate signals, ensuring that they are stored with equal conviction in long-term memory.

The Neuro–Emotional Construct

In Psychextrics

In the Psychextric model, neurotype and emotion are not isolated entities; neither acts completely independently. Instead, they exist in a symbiotic activation loop:

1. Neurotype as Behavioural Algorithm: Each neurotype dictates a default mode of attention, perception, and response—akin to a set of decision-making heuristics pre-tuned to the individual’s neurological architecture.
2. Emotion as Behavioural Amplifier: Emotion is not merely a reaction after perception; it is part of the filtering and encoding process from the very beginning. Emotional weight influences whether a piece of information is even selected for conscious processing.
3. Co-Activation Principle: When a neurotype is activated in response to a stimulus, it instantaneously draws upon an emotion-variant that best supports the behavioural execution. This is not optional—neurotypes appear to be “paired” with specific emotional tones that optimise their behavioural utility.
   • Example: A neurotype adapted for vigilance may automatically draw from anxiety-tinged emotion variants to heighten environmental scanning.
   • Example: A neurotype tuned for social bonding will recruit warmth or trust-related variants to encourage affiliative behaviour.
4. Emotion-Variant Encoding: In Psychextrics, we propose that each neurotype has a limited, preferential library of emotion-variants—pre-encoded combinations of affective state and motivational drive that optimise its behavioural function. These variants are not exclusive but weighted for probability. This explains why the same neurotype may express across multiple emotional contexts but still shows recognisable patterns.

Why This Matters

For FMS

False Memory Syndrome thrives when the neuro-emotional pairing reinforces the plausibility of a memory, even if factually incorrect. The thalamus assigns emotional weight to perceived (or suggested) events before cortical fact-checking, and once a neurotype-emotion pair “locks” into an experience, the memory encoding feels authentic.

• A threat-sensitive neurotype paired with fear or suspicion may treat imagined dangers as fully real.
• A nurturing neurotype paired with grief or loss may fabricate vivid emotional memories of connections that never occurred.

In both cases, the authenticity of the emotion overshadows the accuracy of the content, leading the behavioural output to be shaped as if the memory were true.

The formation of false memory, therefore, is not an isolated malfunction. It is a patterned consequence of an inner ecosystem—a system that interprets, filters, and stores experience according to the emotional weight assigned to it by the neurotype itself.

1. Defining the Neurotype in Psychextrics:

The term neurotype, within psychextrics methodology, refers to the genetically influenced cognitive-operational profile that shapes:

• Sensory prioritisation (what is noticed);
• Pattern recognition style (how meaning is formed);
• Narrative fixation (what becomes memorable);
• Reality fluidity (how boundaries between real, imagined, and remembered blur).

While similar to neurodiversity concepts, psychextrics frames neurotypes less as “differences” and more as behavioural signatures—each carrying unique susceptibilities to memory constructs. Common examples include:

• Visuo-emotive neurotypes, prone to visualisation, fantasy merging, and rich emotional imagery (e.g., associated with artistic FMS cases).
• Verbo-linear neurotypes, oriented toward verbal sequencing and story logic (more prone to confabulated rational memory).
• Echo-reactive neurotypes, highly responsive to emotional suggestion and repetition (more suggestible under pressure).

The architecture of the neurotype is not pathologised in psychextrics. Rather, it is seen as the ‘lens of reality encoding’, the basis on which experience is filtered, stored, and later retrieved—with false memory being one possible output of a system that privileges emotion over precision.

2. Emotion-Variants: The Encoding Layer of Experience:

In the psychextrics model, emotion-variants are inherited or early-developed tendencies to experience core emotions with heightened or dampened intensity. These variants act as filters and amplifiers for memory formation, such that:

• A child with an overactive guilt-variant may generate memory fragments around events of moral failure, even if those events never occurred.
• A person with a fear-latency variant may re-experience imagined threats as lived encounters.
• A high aesthetic-affect variant may internalise dreams and fantasies as vivid memory prints.

FMS emerges, in part, when these emotion-variants override logical encoding processes. The event remembered was emotionally felt, and therefore encoded, regardless of whether it was objectively true. Memory becomes a canvas painted by affect rather than a photograph of reality.

3. Neurotype-Emotion Pairings: Predictive Models of FMS Susceptibility:

By pairing neurotypes with dominant emotion-variants, psychextrics can outline likely profiles along the FMS spectrum:

Neurotype	Dominant Emotion-Variant	FMS Manifestation
Visuo-emotive	Wonder or Awe	Vivid fantasy-based memories (imagined events stored as real)
Verbo-linear	Guilt or Moral Anxiety	Confessional or regretful memory distortions
Echo-reactive	Fear or Trust	Suggestibility-based implanted memories
Dissociative-loop	Sadness or Emptiness	Fragmented self-narratives filled by false placeholders
Symbol-sensory	Longing or Belonging	Cultural or ancestral memory distortions (e.g., past-life experiences)

These combinations help explain why certain individuals are predisposed to developing false memory under certain conditions, and why their memories feel emotionally real even when factually impossible.

4. The Internal Logic of a False Memory:

What makes a false memory so compelling is not its accuracy but its internal emotional logic. For those on the FMS spectrum, especially with high neuro-emotive synchrony, a memory does not need to be externalised fact; it simply needs to feel like it completes an emotional arc.

Thus, the false memory:

• Resolves unresolved tension;
• Reinforces an identity frame;
• Mirrors a symbolic trauma or longing;
• Offers narrative symmetry in life-story construction.

Psychextrics names this process emotogenic narrative reinforcement—the tendency to recall or construct experiences that match one’s emotional reality, even at the cost of factual distortion. This, again, is not seen as defect but as a cognitive survival adaptation.

5. Environmental Triggers: Life Events and the Dormant Neurotype:

While neurotypes and emotion-variants are mostly stable, certain life events activate dormant pathways, especially those associated with unresolved themes (betrayal, abandonment, abuse, guilt). FMS often goes into remission until these environmental echoes reawaken the neuro-emotive imprint.

Examples:

• A person with no history of trauma begins therapy and, through guided suggestion, “recovers” memories of abuse never corroborated.
• A major life transition (e.g., childbirth) activates suppressed emotion-variants and creates symbolic memory constructs of one’s own early experiences.
• A reunion with estranged family members triggers vivid memories that are later found to be inaccurate but emotionally charged.

The psychextrics model frames this reactivation as a neuro-emotive resonance event—where life experiences vibrate in harmony with the emotion-coded neural channels, bringing forth vivid but false recollections.

6. Psychextrics Mapping of FMS:

By mapping the thalamic nuclei responsible for preliminary emotional assignment and identifying the emotion-variant libraries of each neurotype, Psychextrics proposes a method for distinguishing:

1. Real Fears – those that arise from accurate sensory encoding.
2. Paranoid Fears – those sustained by a neurotype–emotion lock despite absence of factual grounding.

Under this framework, paranoia can be placed as a spectrum within the larger FMS spectrum, because both operate on the same neuro-emotional misbinding principle: a neurotype executes an emotional response as though the memory source were valid, even when it is not.

To make these concepts clinically actionable, psychextrics uses a Psychextrics Memory Matrix, mapping FMS across two axes:

• Cognitive Structurality (how logically structured the memory is).
• Emotive Charge (how intensely it is felt).

The four quadrants are:

Quadrant	Type	Features
I	Confabulatory FMS	Loose logic, low emotion; often harmless storytelling
II	Symbolic FMS	Loose logic, high emotion; often metaphorical trauma memories
III	Narrative FMS	Structured logic, high emotion; often implanted or suggested memories
IV	Impressionistic FMS	Vivid snapshots, low coherence; often dream-like or artistic in origin

This mapping helps clinicians and theorists avoid over-pathologising harmless memory phenomena, while identifying when emotional intensity makes distortion potentially disruptive.

7. Towards a Non-Pathological Understanding:

One of psychextrics’ core contributions is removing the stigma from false memory formation. Rather than a malfunction of the brain, it is a function of the person’s unique neuro-emotive architecture—especially when that person has been shaped by trauma, suggestion, or emotional need.

This opens new ethical terrain:

• Can false memories serve symbolic truth?
• Should all false memories be “corrected”?
• How do we differentiate metaphor from manipulation?

By grounding these questions in the neurotype-emotion nexus, we create room for compassion, complexity, and careful intervention.

Root Systems

Of Memory Distortion

Psychextrically, it is evidence-based and anatomically plausible, as a psychextric hypothesis, that the hypothalamic systems (especially stress-related nuclei with mammillary bodies) can bias memory encoding via hormonal and subcortical relay pathways that converge on thalamic memory nuclei (and thereby on hippocampal—diencephalic—cortical memory networks). That biased encoding can make internally generated or emotionally amplified content consolidate as autobiographical memory — i.e. it can help implant a felt-true memory where no factual event occurred.

1. What the neurobiology actually supports (brief, evidence-based points):

1. Hypothalamus drives stress signalling (HPA axis) via PVN to CRH to cortisol, and stress hormones powerfully modulate encoding, consolidation and retrieval of memories. Moderate/acute stress can enhance encoding; chronic or poorly timed stress can impair updating and make memories more rigid. (Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Ghosal S, Kopp B, Wulsin A, Makinson R, Scheimann J, Myers B. [2016]).
2. Mammillary bodies (a hypothalamic complex) are anatomically and functionally embedded in memory circuits (Papez/hippocampal-diencephalic circuitry). They project to anterior thalamic nuclei via the mammillothalamic tract and are important for recollective memory. Damage causes profound memory deficits (Korsakoff etc.). (Vann SD, Nelson AJ. [2015])
3. Anterior and mediodorsal thalamic nuclei participate in episodic/recognition memory and in coordinating cortical memory networks (hippocampus, cingulate, PFC). Thalamic nodes help bind content and support reality-monitoring functions. (Nelson AJD, 2021).
4. Manipulating hypothalamic CRF affects formation of false fear-memories in animal models. Recent rodent work shows hypothalamic CRF modulation alters formation of false contextual fear memory—i.e. hypothalamic signalling can change what becomes encoded as a fear memory. (This is not FMS per se, but directly links hypothalamic CRF to false-like memory formation.) (Kasama E, Moriya M, Kamimura R, Matsuki T, Seki K. [2022]).
5. Stress biases memory toward emotional, schematic, and less updateable forms—producing rigid memories that resist corrective evidence. This psychological effect is mediated by the HPA axis, amygdala–hippocampus interactions and thalamo-cortical circuits. (Susanne Vogel & Lars Schwabe, 2016).

2) A precise psychextric hypothesis (how the hypothalamus to thalamus pathway could “implant” FMS):

Core proposition (psychextric formulation): FMS emerges when the mind’s normal balance between sensory/veridical encoding and affective/narrative encoding is shifted toward the latter. Two hypothalamic mechanisms together produce that shift:

1. Hormonal priming (PVN to HPA): Paraventricular nucleus (PVN) activation and CRF release during stress/threat increases glucocorticoids (cortisol). This hormonal milieu alters hippocampal binding, weakens contextual discrimination, increases amygdala prioritisation and biases consolidation toward emotionally salient fragments rather than accurate conjunctive memory. That makes the system more likely to accept internally produced narratives as significant and store them strongly. (Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Ghosal S, Kopp B, Wulsin A, Makinson R, Scheimann J, Myers B. [2016]).
2. Hypothalamic relay to diencephalic memory nodes (mammillary bodies to mammillothalamic tract to anterior thalamic nuclei): Mammillary bodies (hypothalamic) are anatomically positioned to relay/transform hippocampal output into signals that reach anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN)—a critical hub for integrating memory into autobiographical networks. If the hippocampal signal has been altered by stress/hyperarousal (A), the mammillary to ATN pathway will propagate that biased pattern into thalamic and cortical circuits that consolidate autobiographical recollection. (Christopher M. Dillingham, Aura Frizzati, Andrew J.D. Nelson, Seralynne D.Vann [July 2015]).

How “implantation” works in operational terms (stepwise):

1. Trigger/Priming event: Acute stress, therapist suggestion, repeated social assertion, sleep-fragmented dreaming, or internal rumination activates PVN (hypothalamus), releasing CRF and engaging the HPA axis. This elevates cortisol and engages limbic arousal systems (amygdala, hypothalamus). (Lívea Dornela Godoy;Matheus Teixeira Rossignoli;Polianna Delfino-Pereira; Norberto Garcia-Cairasco;Eduardo Henrique de Lima Umeoka [2018]).
2. Encoding window opened: Elevated arousal changes hippocampal pattern separation/binding (weaker contextual tagging; stronger emotional tagging). That makes source information (internal vs external) less distinct. (Lentoor AG, 2023).
3. Hypothalamic relay: Hippocampal output (now emotionally biased) travels through the fornix to mammillary bodies; mammillary bodies relay via the mammillothalamic tract to anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN). ATN engages cingulate/retrosplenial/entorhinal networks and stabilises the pattern as autobiographical memory. Because the input is already biased, the ATN/cortical loop consolidates a memory that has strong affective weight but poor source validity. (Peterson DC, Reddy V, Mayes DA.[2025]).
4. Reality-monitoring collapse: Mediodorsal thalamus to PFC circuits (important for source monitoring and temporal sequencing) are compromised by stress or are biased toward affective salience; the network therefore fails to correct or suppress the implanted narrative. The false content is increasingly treated as genuine historical experience and resists updating. (Susanne Vogel & Lars Schwabe, 2016).
5. Maintenance: Repetition and social reinforcement (family narrative, therapy, media) strengthen the cortical-thalamic loops and re-activate hypothalamic arousal on recall, creating a feedback loop that entrenches the false memory as identity content.

Key hypothalamic nuclei implicated in the model (specific identification):

• Paraventricular nucleus (PVN): The central HPA driver (CRF release) that sets the hormonal encoding conditions. PVN to CRF to cortisol is the canonical stress pathway. (Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Ghosal S, Kopp B, Wulsin A, Makinson R, Scheimann J, Myers B. [2016]).
• Mammillary bodies (MB): Hypothalamic diencephalic structures that relay hippocampal output to anterior thalamic nuclei via the mammillothalamic tract (a plausible anatomical route for any hypothalamic influence on thalamic memory nodes). MB damage produces recollective memory failure, showing their functional importance. (Vann, Seralynne & Aggleton, John. [2004]).

(Other hypothalamic areas such as the lateral hypothalamus or dorsomedial hypothalamus modulate arousal and behaviour, but the two nuclei above are the ones with direct anatomical and functional ties to memory encoding and HPA signalling.)

Thalamic targets (implantation sites):

• Anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN): Tightly connected to hippocampal–diencephalic memory circuit; implicated in recollective memory and consolidation. The mammillothalamic tract terminates here. (Catherine M. Sweeney-Reed; Lars Buentjen; Jürgen Voges; Friedhelm C. Schmitt; Tino Zaehle; Julia W.Y. Kam; Jörn Kaufmann; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Hermann Hinrichs; Robert T. Knight; Michael D. Rugg.[2021]).
• Mediodorsal nucleus (MD): Important to reality monitoring, PFC coordination, and flexible cognition; biased MD-PFC activity can degrade source monitoring and increase reliance on affective salience. (Giulio Pergola; Lola Danet; Anne-Lise Pitel; Giovanni A. Carlesimo; Shailendra Segobin; Jérémie Pariente; Boris Suchan; Anna S. Mitchell; Emmanuel J. Barbeau.[2018]).
• Pulvinar & other associative thalamic nuclei: Modulate attention and visual salience; they can bias what sensory fragments get prioritised during encoding and later retrieval (relevant for hypervisual FMS profiles). (See reviews on thalamic roles in recognition and attention.) ( Pergola, Giulio, Ranft, Alexander, Mathias, Klaus, Suchan, Boris.[2013]).

3) How this maps paranoia (emotion without evidence) into the FMS spectrum:

• Paranoia (psychextrics framing) results in a forward-projected, threat-oriented bias of the same neuro-emotive system. Instead of a false past memory, the hypothalamic/PVN arousal with biased thalamo-cortical processing creates a felt present or anticipated threat with poor sensory corroboration. The process is the same: arousal alters binding/source monitoring and thalamo-cortical loops treat internally generated threat constructs as real. This places paranoia on the FMS continuum as a present/future-directed confabulation produced by emotion-first encoding. (See stress and memory rigidity literature.) (Tom Smeets, Henry Otgaar, Ingrid Candel, Oliver T. Wolf [2008]).

4) What the psychextrics model does not claim (important caveats):

• This is not a demonstration that hypothalamus alone “creates” FMS. Memory formation is distributed: hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, PFC, and cortical systems are central. The hypothalamus exerts modulatory and relay roles, not sole causation.
• There is no clinical neuropathology that shows a single hypothalamic lesion producing classic FMS in human case series. The psychextrics model is mechanistic and integrative—it explains how hypothalamic state and hypothalamic to thalamic routes can bias encoding toward false, affectively charged memories.
• The strongest direct evidence for hypothalamic causal involvement to date comes from animal studies manipulating CRF (e.g., affecting false fear memory formation) and from lesion/PD models showing the importance of mammillary bodies and ATN in recollection. Human translational proof would require more targeted imaging/causal studies I proposed through Psychextrics Brain Decoding Scanner. (References supporting these caveats are cited below.) (Kasama E, Moriya M, Kamimura R, Matsuki T, Seki K.[2022]).

Therefore, whilst there is no simple “hypothalamic generator” proof for FMS today. But the science of psychextrics legitimately propose a biologically plausible, testable pathway in which hypothalamic nuclei (PVN via HPA and mammillary bodies via the mammillothalamic tract) bias hippocampal outputs and engage anterior/mediodorsal thalamic memory hubs so strongly—under stress, suggestion, or rumination—that internally generated narratives consolidate as autobiographical memory. This model ties together existing anatomy and physiology (HPA, mammillary→ATN relay, thalamic role in memory) and points to precise experimental tests.

What is rooted in the system of memory distortion is this: False memory is not born in isolation. It is seeded in the roots of neurotype, watered by emotion-variant currents, and shaped by the winds of experience and suggestion. The psychextrics framework reveals FMS not as a flaw to be eradicated but as a signal—a meaningful artefact of how a person’s inner world strives to make sense of emotion through narrative.

In the sections to follow, we will explore how this neuro-emotive encoding process interacts with neuroplasticity, emotional flashpoints, and the construction of self over time. For to understand false memory is, in the end, to understand what it means to feel before one knows—and to believe before one remembers.

MEMORY INTRUSION, EMOTIONAL ENCODING, AND NEUROPLASTICITY

False memory does not enter the mind as an intruder in the night. It often arrives as a whisper—faint, familiar, and emotionally resonant. In psychextrics science, the condition known as False Memory Syndrome (FMS) is not simply about what is remembered, but how memory systems are penetrated, encoded, and reshaped over time. At the centre of this process lies a triad of forces: memory intrusion, emotional encoding, and neuroplasticity.

Each of these elements operates along a psychological and neurobiological axis, but when viewed through psychextrics, they reveal something deeper: a behavioural-genetic signature that predisposes certain minds to internalise suggestions, reframe emotional intensity as autobiographical memory, and restructure neural maps around emotionally charged but unreal events.

This chapter explores how memories—both true and false—are not fixed recordings, but rather mutable constructs, vulnerable to both external influence and internal re-editing. We trace how memory intrusions penetrate the psyche, how emotional energy turns suggestion into certainty, and how the brain’s plasticity serves not only healing but also deceptive reconstruction.

1. Memory Intrusion: The Seed of Constructed Reality: In the clinical sciences, memory intrusion is typically framed as an involuntary recollection—thoughts or images that enter consciousness without intent. In the psychextrics lens, however, we expand this definition: intrusion includes any narrative or imagery that bypasses the subject’s volitional memory gate and becomes accepted into their self-story.

Intrusions may arise from:

• Suggestion by authority figures (e.g. therapists, parents, media);
• Trauma-filling (emotional gaps filled by imagined or absorbed scenarios);
• Dream-absorption (vivid dreams later mistaken for memory);
• Cultural osmosis (mythical or collective memories internalised as personal).

Such intrusions do not merely drift across the surface of thought—they penetrate the memory-identity boundary. For individuals on the FMS spectrum, this boundary is often more porous, allowing unverified fragments to settle as lived experience.

Psychiatrically, this has led to misdiagnoses of delusion or malingering. But psychextrics reframes this as a susceptibility profile, often shaped by neurotype-emotion interactions, where the perceptual-emotive threshold between internal and external reality is thinner, and thus more prone to narrative invasion.

2. Emotional Encoding: The Fuel That Fixes the Memory: Memory alone does not cement itself in the psyche—emotion is the binding agent. Emotional encoding refers to the phenomenon whereby events attached to strong affective states are more likely to be retained, recalled, and reinforced. But in FMS, the situation becomes more complex.

A false event may be encoded as truth if:

• It carries a strong emotional charge at the time of suggestion (e.g., fear, guilt, awe).
• It symbolically resolves an emotional wound or conflict.
• It is repeatedly imagined or rehearsed under emotional duress.

Thus, the truth-value of memory is not determined by its factual origin, but by its emotional fidelity to the person’s internal experience. In psychextrics, this is termed emotologic recall—where memory is constructed or preserved based on how well it aligns with one’s felt emotional narrative.

This mechanism is most evident in:

• Recovered memory cases, where visualised scenes gain emotional weight over time until they are “remembered.”
• Therapeutic false implantations, where repeated affirmations (“It’s safe to remember”) anchor an imagined event in emotional certitude.
• Familial conflict distortions, where a child unconsciously creates a false memory to rationalise emotional neglect or pain.

In each case, emotion acts not merely as a flavour of memory, but as the architect of its scaffolding.

3. Neuroplasticity and the Mutable Memory Circuit: Neuroplasticity is often celebrated as the brain’s great gift—the power to rewire, repair, and relearn. But psychextrics invites us to consider its dual edge: plasticity also enables memory reconstruction based on emotionally potent intrusions.

Through repeated emotional rehearsal, the brain:

• Reinforces synaptic pathways associated with imagined scenarios.
• Strengthens neural networks that prioritise emotionally charged memories over neutral or contradictory ones.
• Gradually rewrites past events through the filter of present emotional truth.

For individuals with high emotional plasticity, this means:

• A false event rehearsed often enough under emotional pressure may overwrite original memory traces.
• A single emotionally intense experience (such as a manipulated therapy session) may anchor an entire false narrative.
• Imagined events may recruit the same neural circuits as actual memories, making subjective distinction difficult.

Recent neuroscience supports this. Studies using fMRI show that recalling imagined events can activate hippocampal and amygdala regions in nearly identical patterns as real memory recall—especially when visual detail and emotion are involved. Unlike psychextrics methods that maps the brain architecture to interprets behaviours, the line between fiction and recollection is not always drawn in grey in traditional psychiatric or neuropsychological frameworks—it is often invisible, because:

1. Both rely on subjective reports.
2. Both activate overlapping neural and emotional substrates.
3. Both can be maintained with high internal conviction, even in the absence of corroborating evidence.

However, under psychextrics methods, the boundary can be made visible and explicitly charted by mapping the thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei to their respective emotional encoding pathways.

4. Psychextrics Classifications of Memory Intrusion: Within the psychextrics framework, memory intrusions are classified based on their emotional encoding strength and degree of narrative consolidation:

Type	Intrusion Source	Emotional Encoding	Result
Phantom Recall	Dream or fantasy	Low–moderate	Vague but persistent ‘remembering’
Implanted Core	External suggestion	High	Central life memory falsely constructed
Echo-Memory	Cultural narrative	Moderate–high	Historical or ancestral memory internalised
Substitutional Recall	Trauma-fill	High	False memory replaces repressed true event
Reflective Fabrication	Self-generated logic	Moderate	Memory invented to resolve emotional paradox

This classification system provides a blueprint not only for diagnosis, but for understanding the origin point of false memory in a given individual’s psychextrics makeup.

5. The Therapeutic Paradox: Healing Through Fabrication: One of the greatest ethical challenges in FMS therapy is what psychextrics calls the therapeutic paradox: sometimes, a false memory alleviates real suffering. A fabricated recollection may help the individual:

• Construct a coherent identity;
• Externalise internal shame;
• Validate previously invalidated emotional pain;
• Anchor meaning to existential uncertainty.

This raises difficult questions:

• Should the false memory be “corrected,” even if its removal destabilises the person?
• Can therapeutic value ever justify cognitive distortion?
• Is narrative truth as valuable as empirical truth in trauma recovery?

Psychextrics does not offer a rigid answer, but rather a spectrum of interpretive possibilities. If the memory serves a compensatory function, it may be preserved but recontextualised as symbolic rather than literal. If it was maliciously implanted, it must be dismantled through reorientation of the emotional encoding pathway.

6. Psychextrics Interventions: Rewiring Emotional Pathways: To address FMS at its neuro-emotive root, psychextrics proposes non-invasive, participatory therapies that include:

• Affective Displacement Rituals: Redirecting emotional charge from the false memory to a neutralised symbolic outlet (e.g. art, body movement).
• Memory Reality Differentiation (MRD): Teaching clients to tag memories with origin flags (e.g. “felt,” “imagined,” “told”) to re-establish internal credibility markers.
• Neuroemotive Anchoring: Introducing new emotionally positive narratives that overwrite the false memory’s emotional imprint.
• Narrative Dualism Dialogue: Allowing the person to speak both “selves”—the one who remembers and the one who doubts—thereby integrating the divided memory space.

These interventions do not attempt to erase memory. Rather, they de-activate the emotional encoding that makes the memory feel undeniably true.

The Mind as Architect,

Not Archivist

In classical psychology, the mind is often seen as an imperfect archivist—struggling to faithfully store and retrieve data. But psychextrics proposes a different metaphor: the mind is an architect, and memory is not a record but a blueprint in constant revision.

Memory intrusion, emotional encoding, and neuroplasticity are not flaws—they are design principles. They are what allow us to adapt, survive, create, and sometimes… misremember.

For example, under the psychextrics model, paranoia can be understood as a spectrum within the broader spectrum of False Memory Syndrome (FMS), especially when we frame FMS not merely as “fabricated events” but as an output of a cognitive-emotional system that privileges affective salience over evidentiary precision.

In this framing, both paranoia and FMS share the same structural origin: a memory-emotion arbitration system in which emotionally encoded inputs are given disproportionate weight over sensory or factual verification. The divergence between them is in the content and temporal orientation of the distortion:

• FMS: Primarily reconstructive errors about the past, either from suggestion or spontaneous confabulation.
• Paranoia: Projective errors about the present or near future, in which emotional weighting transforms ambiguous or neutral stimuli into threatening narratives.

Psychextric Mapping

Of Paranoia vs. Real Fear

Psychextrics treats each emotional state as the output of a neurotype-emotion nexus — the genetically and environmentally shaped baseline of how incoming sensory data are filtered and emotionally prioritised.

1. The Thalamus as Sensory Gatekeeper:

• Real fear: Thalamus routes incoming threat-relevant stimuli (visual/auditory) through the lateral geniculate nucleus (vision) or medial geniculate nucleus (audition) with corroborating sensory detail.
• Paranoia: Sensory input is often partial, ambiguous, or unrelated to actual threat, but the mediodorsal nucleus biases interpretation toward danger through prior associative weighting (learned or genetically favoured).

2. The Hypothalamus as Emotional Amplifier:

• Real fear: Hypothalamic activation (especially in the paraventricular and dorsomedial nuclei) corresponds proportionally to the degree of verified threat, driving adaptive fight-or-flight output.
• Paranoia: Disproportionate hypothalamic arousal occurs without congruent sensory verification — meaning the emotional encoding pathway is primed by internal narratives or memory-like constructs rather than factual sensory confirmation.

3. Emotion Encoding Pathways:

• Real fear: Limbic feedback loop (amygdala to hippocampus) integrates accurate sensory time stamps — what happened, when, where.
• Paranoia: Loop integrates synthetic or ambiguous timestamps — “something is happening now” without sensory anchor, often borrowing imagery, tone, or context from unrelated memories.

Diagnosis

Under Psychextric Method

By mapping real-time thalamic and hypothalamic activation patterns during the recall or perception of threat, the psychextric approach can:

1. Identify whether emotion precedence is driven by verified sensory feed or memory-derived construction.
2. Chart emotional residue overlaps between paranoia and FMS—demonstrating that both may stem from emotional over-privileging over factual consistency.
3. Place paranoia on the FMS spectrum, specifically as forward-projected confabulation — a misallocation of emotional certainty toward unverified future or present events.

In psychextric terms:

• FMS rewrites the past under emotional bias.
• Paranoia writes the present or future under emotional bias.

Both are distortions created when the emotional encoding system—rooted in thalamic-hypothalamic mapping — is allowed to outrun factual verification, and both can be placed on a shared diagnostic continuum.

The boundary that appears “invisible” in traditional approaches can, in psychextrics, be drawn with neuro-emotional cartography—making it possible to distinguish fear with evidence from fear without foundation.

1. The Thalamus as Emotional Gatekeeper in FMS:

In the psychextric view, the thalamus is not merely a relay station; it is an active evaluator of sensory and internally generated signals. When incoming sensory or mnemonic data is processed:

• Sensory relevance weighting happens first—which sense is prioritised?
• Urgency tagging is assigned—fight, flight, freeze, or ignore.
• Preliminary emotional tone is infused—e.g., curiosity, suspicion, comfort, fear.

This means that before the cortex interprets “what happened,” the thalamus has already shaped how it should feel and express about what happened. In the case of false memories, if the emotional tagging is strong enough, the cortex may encode and later retrieve it as factually real—because the emotional charge makes it neurologically “sticky.”

2. Neurotypes and Emotional Variants:

In psychextrics, a neurotype is a behavioural algorithm—a patterned way the nervous system perceives, processes, and reacts to the world—shaped by structural and chemical factors like:

• Thalamic wiring patterns.
• Cortical density and connectivity.
• Synaptic efficiency (plasticity speed and stability).
• Gene-expression patterns that influence neurotransmitter profiles.

However, neurotype works within the core of three basic approaches across species, which defines how each specie perceive the world around them and responds to stimuli:

Neurotype A – Standalone but Cooperative: Neurotype and emotion can operate independently in principle—the neurotype being a predispositional “operating system” and emotion being a modulating “state.” However, in actual behaviour, they almost always co-opt each other because neither has full behavioural expression without the other. A neurotype without emotion is mechanical; emotion without neurotype lacks direction.

Plant is an example of species with neurotype without emotion. In plants, behavioural algorithm exists, but it is purely mechanistic, without emotional modulation. Behaviour is entirely driven by direct stimulus–response chains.

Example in Plants:

• Mimosa pudica (the “sensitive plant”) folds its leaves when touched.
• Venus flytrap closes in response to hair-trigger stimulation.
• Electrical signals travel between cells, but there is no hypothalamic equivalent to generate emotion.
• Relay core: Possibly the plant phloem/xylem electrical network acting as a primitive gating system (no emotional weighting).

Psychextric interpretation: This is a clear example of “pure neurotype” in plants—direction without emotion. A thalamus-like gate exists, but without the hypothalamic “emotional switch.”

Neurotype B – Instantaneous Co-Activation: In most real-time scenarios, activation of a neurotype instantaneously pulls in an emotion variant. Example: An analytic neurotype might instantly recruit calm scepticism in normal contexts, but under stress, it might instead recruit defensive irritation—a shift in emotion variant that alters the behavioural output.

Animals are a clear example of independent neurotype and emotion that temporarily co-opt each other. In some animals, neurotype and emotion are distinct systems that activate independently, but can couple temporarily to express a single behaviour.

Example in Animals:

• Reptiles (e.g., snakes, lizards)—Highly sensory-driven behaviours (predation, thermoregulation) with limited, intermittent emotional modulation (fear, aggression).
• Neurotype: Instinct-driven (e.g., prey detection circuits in optic tectum).
• Emotion: Triggered via hypothalamus during high-stakes events (fight-or-flight).
• In FMS analogy: False memories may emerge when an emotional surge coincides with a neutral sensory memory, causing the two to “fuse” even if unrelated.

Psychextric interpretation: Emotion can “hijack” or “ride along” with a pre-existing neurotype pattern. They are separable, but opportunistically merge.

Neurotype C – Neurotype-Emotion Encoding Pairs: Some neurotypes have preferred emotional variants encoded in their baseline operation. For example:

• A vigilant neurotype may default to heightened suspicion or caution.
• A gregarious neurotype may default to warmth or curiosity.
  This doesn’t mean they can’t use other emotions—but they have “home” variants that shape their typical outputs.

Humans are a clear example of species with neurotype pre-linked to specific emotion variants. Each neurotype comes pre-encoded with a paired emotion variant; activation of a neurotype automatically summons its emotional counterpart.

Example in Humans:

• Fear-of-loss neurotype (e.g., parental care circuits in mammals) instantly triggers protective fear emotion.
• Competitive dominance neurotype (status-seeking circuits) instantly triggers pride or territorial aggression.
• Thalamus with hypothalamus operate in a tightly bound loop; there is no “separate activation”—both fire together.
• In FMS analogy: Emotional recall is inseparable from the neurotype that generated it, so once the neurotype is activated, the memory feels factually true regardless of evidence.

Psychextric interpretation: This is the most fusion-based model—emotion and neurotype are essentially one package.

To get a clearer view of the three core neurotypes, domestication-ready species almost always lean toward Neurotype C in the Psychextrics model.

Here’s why:

• In Neurotype C, the neurotype and emotion are hard-linked—meaning that when a behavioural program is activated (e.g., “seek social contact”), its corresponding emotional reward (e.g., affection, trust) automatically follows.
• This pre-linking allows certain animals to form stable emotional bonds with humans because their social bonding neurotype is tied to a positive emotion variant such as comfort, security, or pleasure.

• Examples:
• Dogs—Pack bonding neurotype triggers oxytocin-linked affection.
• Horses—Herd cooperation neurotype triggers calmness in familiar handlers.
• Domesticated cats (to a lesser degree)—Social tolerance neurotype linked with mild affection, but more situational.

In contrast:

• Neurotype B animals (e.g., many reptiles, some birds) can be tamed but not fully domesticated, because their social neurotype and affection emotion are separate. They might accept human presence during feeding (neurotype: “food source recognition”), but that doesn’t auto-trigger affection.
• Neurotype A species (plants, some very simple aquatic animals) lack the emotional layer entirely, so domestication in the emotional sense isn’t applicable—they can only be cultivated.

3. FMS in the Neurotype–Emotion Framework:

From this lens, false memories are not just cognitive errors but neuro-emotional constructs. The thalamus, in its gatekeeping role, can assign an emotional weight to an internally generated or externally suggested memory. If the emotion aligns with the dominant neurotype’s preferred variants, the cortex is more likely to store and retrieve that memory as “true.”

Example:

• Neurotype: High-vigilance;
• Emotion variant: Heightened suspicion;
• Suggested false memory: “You were betrayed by someone in your youth”;
• Because this matches the neurotype’s “emotional home,” the thalamus fast-tracks it with high urgency and embeds it in the cortical memory systems as fact.

4. Why Emotion Deserves Credit Even When the Memory is False:

In psychextrics, we acknowledge that emotion modulates behavioural output regardless of factual accuracy because:

• Emotion determines how the brain tags importance in data.
• Once emotionally tagged, a memory—even if false—can recruit the same behavioural scripts as a real one.
• Therefore, the behavioural outcome can be identical whether the memory is genuine or constructed.

5. Psychextric Clarification:

Under this perspective:

• Neurotype is the structural template.
• Emotion variant is the dynamic modifier.
• Behaviour emerges from the fusion of both, and FMS is best understood as the misalignment between factual memory content and accurate emotional source attribution.

False Memory Syndrome, therefore, is thus not the story of a mind gone wrong, but the story of a mind trying to make right—trying to find coherence, emotion, and identity in a world too complex to store without distortion.

In the next chapter, I turn to one of the most foundational psychextrics questions: How does identity itself form around memory—and how can reality be anchored when memory cannot be trusted?

CHAPTER 4

IDENTITY FORMATION AND REALITY ANCHORING IN PSYCHEXTRICS

A person is not simply a bundle of cells with memories. A person is a narrative being—a self that emerges from remembered fragments, emotionally significant events, cultural symbols, and internal logic stitched together to form identity.

In the psychextrics paradigm, False Memory Syndrome (FMS) is not an isolated neurological glitch. It is a condition of narrative distortion, where the blueprint of the self is built using unreliable memory bricks, yet the architecture still stands—coherent, inhabited, and emotionally real.

The psychextrics approach to identity asks not only who are you?, but what memories gave birth to the version of you that you now inhabit? If the foundations are altered—if fabricated memories are seeded and emotionally cemented—how do we anchor reality? How do we rescue selfhood from the fog of misremembered history?

This chapter investigates how identity forms through memory systems, how reality is “anchored” neurologically and emotionally, and what happens when that anchoring breaks down under the pressure of suggestion, trauma, or internal symbolic necessity.

1. The Self as a Memory Construct:

In psychextrics, identity is not an essence but a constructive phenomenon—the emergent sum of emotionally encoded memory, behavioural pattern, neurotype, and social feedback. At its core, the self is a narrative that is remembered, not simply lived.

This process has three key elements:

• Autobiographical Memory: The remembered events that form a timeline of the self. These are the “I was” statements—childhood, family, school, loss, triumph.
• Emotional Significance: Identity privileges emotionally charged memories, which anchor values, fears, loyalties, and taboos. A single emotionally potent moment can outweigh years of mundane memory.
• Symbolic Integration: The self does not just remember facts—it interprets them symbolically to form meaning. Memory becomes myth; story becomes self.

False memories, when emotionally encoded and narratively consistent, are seamlessly absorbed into this process. As a result, the individual may build an entire self-concept on events that never happened—and defend those memories with fervour, because to lose the memory would be to lose part of the self.

2. Psychextrics Identity Types and FMS Susceptibility:

Certain psychextrics identity types are more vulnerable to false memory implantation and internalisation. These types are not pathologies but configurations of neurotype-emotion pathways.

Identity Type	Description	FMS Vulnerability
Absorptive	Highly empathic, suggestible, and imaginative. Merges inner and outer experience.	High
Symbolic Integrator	Constructs identity through symbolic meaning rather than factual accuracy.	Moderate–High
Narrative Fragmentor	Has difficulty forming a coherent life story. Gaps are unconsciously filled.	Moderate
Reality Anchorer	Prioritises external validation, logic, and factual consistency.	Low
Emotional Architect	Builds identity through internalised emotional states, often using imagined histories.	High

These types are neither good nor bad. In fact, absorptive and emotional types may exhibit high creativity, empathy, or visionary capacity. However, their very strengths create fertile ground for memory distortion—especially when exposed to high emotional stress or authoritative suggestion.

3. The Collapse of Reality Anchoring:

Reality anchoring is the process by which memory is validated against external markers: facts, timelines, witnesses, cultural norms, and logic. In healthy memory development, the mind constantly negotiates between subjective experience and objective reality, adjusting the narrative accordingly.

FMS occurs when this anchoring system fails or is overwhelmed. This collapse can be caused by:

• Therapeutic Overreach: Therapists unintentionally reinforcing imagined or suggestive material as recovered memory.
• Family Gaslighting: Individuals repeatedly told a false version of events until their emotional certainty overrides factual doubt.
• Trauma Amnesia Gaps: Emotional pain creates “blackouts” in memory, which the psyche then fills with plausible yet false reconstructions.
• Symbolic Demand: The unconscious mind constructs a memory to fulfil a psychological need (e.g. to explain internal pain or affirm victimhood).

In each case, the emotional and symbolic consistency of the false memory may outweigh the absence of factual verification. Once emotionally encoded, the memory becomes immune to contradiction. At that point, identity and delusion merge—and reality becomes internally self-referential.

4. Symbolic Truth vs. Empirical Truth:

One of the most delicate distinctions in psychextrics is between symbolic truth and empirical truth:

• Empirical Truth is the event that occurred, verifiable by external sources.
• Symbolic Truth is the emotional or psychological meaning that an event represents for the person.

FMS often arises when symbolic truth becomes mistaken for empirical truth. For example, a person may “remember” childhood abuse that never happened—not as an intentional lie, but as a symbolic expression of betrayal, neglect, or unresolved emotional pain.

Psychextrics does not deny the pain, but relocates the truth to the symbolic register. In therapy, the goal is not to invalidate the person’s feelings, but to clarify: the memory is symbolic, not historical; the pain is real, but the event may not be.

5. Re-Anchoring Reality: Psychextrics Therapies for Identity Repair:

To address the identity distortions caused by false memories, psychextrics offers a set of integrative therapeutic strategies:

A. Temporal Re-Mapping:

Clients are guided to create a visual-emotional map of their life timeline, marking both verified and unverifiable memories. This exposes gaps, contradictions, and “implanted clusters,” allowing the conscious mind to realign the narrative.

B. Memory Provenance Dialogue:

Each key memory is questioned gently:

• “When did you first remember this?”
• “Who told you this story?”
• “Can you recall sensory details, or just emotion?”

This technique helps differentiate primary from secondary memory sources.

C. Dual-Track Identity Construction:

Clients are taught to hold two narratives:

• The “felt” self (emotion-based)
• The “verified” self (fact-based)

Rather than force one over the other, they are invited to integrate both. This creates a hybrid identity that acknowledges internal truth while reclaiming reality anchoring.

D. External Anchoring Rituals:

These involve reconnecting with physical places, people, or objects from one’s real past to reinforce the neural anchoring of authentic memories.

6. The Ethical Role of Identity in Justice and Psychiatry:

The breakdown of reality anchoring has implications beyond therapy—it affects law, relationships, and social cohesion.

• In courts, false memories have led to wrongful convictions and false accusations.
• In families, they have shattered relationships built on events that never happened.
• In activism, they have created collective trauma movements based on unverifiable narratives.

The challenge, however, is that these memories feel real. They are not lies. They are mis-assignments of memory and meaning. Psychextrics jurisprudence must therefore ask: When identity is formed around falsity, what rights and responsibilities remain?

This question is explored further in Part III of this book. But for now, I close this section with the central psychextrics tenet:

Memory is the clay of identity, and emotion is the fire that hardens it. To reshape identity, we must reheat the memory—gently, compassionately, and with epistemic care.

In the next section, I examine one of the most elusive psychological mechanisms that gives rise to false memory: Defensive Imagination and Trauma-Constructs—how the mind invents memories to protect itself, survive pain, and find coherence in chaos.

DEFENSIVE IMAGINATIONAND TRAUMA-CONSTRUCTS

The psyche is not a passive recorder of experience—it is a dynamic constructor of meaning, driven by survival, coherence, and emotional regulation. When faced with unbearable pain, confusion, or discontinuity, the mind may deploy its most potent internal technology: defensive imagination. This mechanism does not lie—it rearranges. It reshapes reality into a form that can be emotionally endured, even if it departs from factual truth.

In the psychextrics paradigm, this is the genesis of trauma-constructs: invented or distorted memories that serve as emotional defences, narrative scaffolds, or coping rituals in the aftermath of internal disintegration.

This chapter examines how the imaginative faculty becomes a survival mechanism in the face of trauma, how trauma-constructs form and evolve, and how they intertwine with the architecture of False Memory Syndrome (FMS). Far from being pathological delusions, these constructs are often emotionally intelligent solutions—until they become maladaptive and begin to fracture the individual’s relationship with reality.

1. Imagination as a Defensive Organ:

Imagination is typically celebrated as a creative or aesthetic faculty. But in psychextrics, we recognise it as an adaptive neurological response to psychic threat. Just as the immune system develops antibodies against infections, the imaginative mind develops narratives to buffer overwhelming psychological stimuli.

There are four defensive functions of imagination relevant to FMS:

• Narrative Substitution: Replacing unprocessable trauma with an invented storyline that restores control or coherence.
• Symbolic Relocation: Transferring internal pain into an external event that explains it.
• Temporal Reframing: Altering the sequence or origin of events to reduce guilt or fear.
• Protective Villainisation: Assigning blame or harm to an invented antagonist to preserve core attachments or self-concept.

These mechanisms may generate false memories that feel more emotionally “correct” than real ones—because they validate internal experience, even when they falsify external history.

2. The Genesis of Trauma-Constructs:

Trauma-constructs do not appear arbitrarily. They follow a discernible psychextrics pattern:

Stage	Description	Psychextrics Trigger
Dissociation or Memory Gapping	A traumatic event causes a rupture in memory continuity.	Emotional overload, threat to self-image, or cognitive dissonance
Narrative Vacuum	The absence of memory becomes intolerable. The mind seeks explanation.	Need for meaning, stability, or moral structure
Imaginative Activation	Imagination supplies a plausible, symbolic memory to fill the gap.	Based on existing fears, social cues, or internal mythologies
Emotional Encoding	The construct is emotionally affirmed and begins to “feel true.”	Reinforced by affect, repetition, and social validation
Memory Integration	The construct is absorbed into the autobiographical self.	It becomes indistinguishable from real memory

Importantly, this process is often unconscious. The individual does not “choose” to fabricate a memory. Rather, the mind protects itself by generating a memory that completes the emotional logic of a broken life story.

3. Case Patterns: Protective and Projective Constructs:

There are two dominant types of trauma-constructs seen in FMS:

A. Protective Constructs:

These emerge when the true memory is too unbearable to face.

• A survivor of childhood neglect may invent memories of consistent parental care to protect the idealised family image.
• Conversely, a child who cannot emotionally survive parental betrayal may invent an abusive neighbour or teacher as the source of trauma.

Here, false memory is a refuge.

B. Projective Constructs:

These occur when internal pain seeks an external explanation.

• An adult experiencing chronic anxiety or depression may “recover” memories of ritual abuse, alien abduction, or satanic cults—narratives that fit internal chaos.
• The trauma-construct offers a target to project suffering onto, giving form to the formless pain.

While seemingly irrational, such constructs can temporarily stabilise the self—until they begin to distort social reality, erode trust, or lead to actions based on fabricated histories.

4. When the Imagination Becomes Entrapment:

The same imagination that protected the mind can later imprison it. Once the trauma-construct is integrated, it becomes resistant to contradiction:

• Logical confrontation fails because the memory is emotionally encoded.
• Therapeutic challenge may feel like abuse, as it threatens the constructed self.
• Family or social denial of the event is interpreted as gaslighting or betrayal.

Thus, the individual defends the false memory not to deceive others, but to preserve internal order. To question it is to unravel the scaffolding of survival. This creates a paradox: the person is both victim of the original trauma and hostage to the invented narrative.

5. Psychextrics Healing: Deconstructing the Construct:

In psychextrics healing, the aim is not to “erase” the false memory, but to release its defensive function. We do this through a process called narrative uncoupling.

Phase 1: Emotional Legitimacy:

We begin by affirming the real pain beneath the construct. The goal is to separate emotional truth from factual truth.

“Your pain is real—even if the memory may not be.”

This softens defensiveness and builds therapeutic trust.

Phase 2: Construct Dialogue:

The false memory is approached as a character or symbol, not a lie. The person is invited to explore:

• “What does this memory protect you from?”
• “What does it give you permission to feel?”
• “If the memory were a metaphor, what would it represent?”

This de-symbolises the construct and opens pathways to deeper origin wounds.

Phase 3: Memory Reassignment:

As the real origin of emotional pain is located, the false memory is gently reclassified—not erased, but repositioned as a symbolic fragment of the psyche.

The person may say:

“I used to believe that happened. Now I understand what my mind was trying to show me.”

This preserves dignity while restoring epistemic integrity.

6. The Creative Edge: From Defensive to Expressive Imagination:

Not all trauma-constructs are destructive. Some can be redirected into artistic genius, narrative therapy, or visionary expression.

• Individuals with high imagination may become novelists, screenwriters, or performance artists who transmute their trauma-constructs into symbolic art.
• The psychextrics therapist may invite these clients to “retell” their internal myths in fiction or ritual form—transforming pathology into narrative liberation.

Thus, defensive imagination evolves into expressive imagination, healing through aesthetic re-narration.

7. Ethical and Clinical Boundaries:

In clinical work, therapists must tread carefully. Misjudging a trauma-construct as delusion can retraumatise. Validating it too literally can entrench falsehood.

The psychextrics ethic proposes a middle path:

• Do not assume lies where there is symbolic logic.
• Do not affirm events that lack anchoring simply to reduce distress.
• Support the client’s emotional journey while gently guiding them toward epistemic clarity.

The healing of false memory lies in this paradoxical skill: honour the reason the story was created, even as you help the person rewrite it.

In the final analysis, the mind does not invent trauma-constructs to deceive, but to survive. In psychextrics, we do not tear down the illusion with force. We listen to what it tried to say. And once its message is understood, the illusion dissolves—not by denial, but by evolution.

With this, we complete Part II – Psychextrics Frameworks. In the next chapter, I turn to Part III – Clinical Pathways and Interventions, where theory becomes application, and memory becomes medicine.

CHAPTER 5

FMS AS A PORTAL TO HYPERVISUALISATION

False Memory Syndrome (FMS) is often framed within clinical psychiatry as a condition of distortion, dysfunction, or epistemic failure. Yet, within the psychextrics framework, an alternative hypothesis arises: What if certain forms of FMS are not merely malfunctions of memory, but gateways to heightened inner vision—an evolved, if misdirected, capacity for hypervisualisation?

This chapter initiates Part III by exploring the possibility that individuals on certain spectrums of FMS may exhibit exceptional visual imagination, heightened symbolic cognition, and a striking ability to generate immersive internal experiences. Rather than solely viewing FMS through the lens of pathology, psychextrics examines it as a potential neuro-emotive mutation—where the boundary between memory, fantasy, and perception becomes both permeable and productive.

1. The Anatomy of Hypervisualisation:

Hypervisualisation is the psychextrics term for an intensified ability to visualise internal scenes, faces, events, and narratives with near-photographic or cinematic vividness. It is not the same as typical imagination or daydreaming—it is immersive, detailed, and emotionally charged.

Individuals with FMS often:

• Recall “memories” with a vividness that rivals reality.
• Report fine-grain visual details (clothing, lighting, facial micro-expressions) in scenes that never occurred.
• Experience these “memories” not as thoughts but as internal visions, akin to flashbacks or dreams.

Neurologically, this correlates with hyperactivity in the default mode network (DMN), along with elevated connectivity between the visual cortex, limbic system, and episodic memory centres (especially the hippocampus and precuneus). In these individuals, the line between “imagined” and “remembered” is not merely blurred—it is actively synthesised.

2. The Psychic Ecology of Visual Fabrication:

Why would the brain develop such a vivid power of visual fabrication, especially in contexts of trauma or emotional instability?

Psychextrics proposes three evolutionary functions:

• Symbolic Substitution: When direct experience is intolerable, the mind visualises metaphorical scenes that symbolise unresolved emotion.
• Narrative Completion: When emotional stories lack closure, the visual imagination fills the gap with coherent narrative imagery.
• Empathic Simulation: Hypervisualisation allows the self to simulate realities—both to prepare for potential threats and to explore identity permutations.

Thus, the fabricated memory in FMS is not random. It is symbolically coded and emotionally resonant, often operating as a kind of inner theatre that the conscious mind misreads as autobiography.

3. False Memory as Mnemonic Creativity:

In creative psychology, we recognise that many artists, writers, and visionaries operate in a mental space where imagination mimics memory. Psychextrics simply draws this parallel into clinical space: those with FMS are often involuntary creatives—people whose minds unconsciously generate internal art in response to psychological need.

Consider these phenomena:

• Scene-generation: The spontaneous imagining of complex narrative sequences.
• Visual eideticism: The ability to hold internally generated images in sustained, high-resolution form.
• Emotive embellishment: The unconscious addition of emotional colour, soundtrack, or lighting to imagined memories.

These traits are often evident in individuals with FMS—and also in artists, screenwriters, mythmakers, and dreamers.

The difference? The artist knows it’s fiction. The FMS sufferer believes it is real.

4. Trauma as the Canvas of Inner Vision:

Hypervisualisation in FMS often follows traumatic rupture. Why?

Trauma destabilises the self’s relationship with time, causality, and identity. In that psychological vacuum, the mind does not retreat—it creates.

The psychextrics interpretation is that trauma cracks the rigid walls of cognitive realism, allowing symbolic material to rise from the subconscious in visual form. These visualised constructs:

• Map the unspoken.
• Give face to fear.
• Offer closure, justice, or redemption in fictive terms.

In this light, FMS becomes not a lie but a symbol mistaken for a fact. The healing process involves not denial but reframing—guiding the person to reinterpret the vision as an emotional myth rather than a biographical record.

5. Hypervisualisation and the Artistic Spectrum:

Many individuals who report false memories also demonstrate elevated artistic tendencies. This includes:

• Drawing or painting lifelike scenes from internal visions.
• Writing autobiographical fiction based on imagined experiences.
• Performing theatre or ritual based on interior mythologies.

These capacities may overlap with phenomena observed in:

• Savant syndrome.
• Highly Sensitive Persons (HSPs).
• Autistic creativity.
• Complex PTSD narrative production.
• Post-traumatic growth through art.

In these cases, the same neural architecture that mis-assigns memory may amplify visionary cognition. From a psychextrics angle, this places FMS not only within pathology but within neurodivergent brilliance.

6. Ethical Horizons: Visionaries or Victims?

Reframing FMS as a potential creative portal comes with ethical responsibility.

• Clinicians must not romanticise suffering, nor ignore the destructive effects of false accusations or personal delusion.
• But neither should they pathologise imaginative gifts when they surface as symptoms.

The psychextrics ethic holds that:

“Truth and beauty both emerge from the mind’s effort to survive.”

If the mind creates a false memory to anchor pain, and that memory births art or insight, then the task of healing is not erasure—it is transmutation.

7. Therapeutic Redirection: From Falsehood to Fiction:

Rather than suppressing the creative engine behind false memory, psychextrics intervention seeks to redirect it:

• Narrative therapy: Encouraging clients to retell their “memories” as symbolic stories, reclaiming agency over fiction.
• Visual journaling: Drawing or painting the inner scenes, then exploring them as metaphors.
• Mythopoetic healing: Reworking false memory into personal myth, anchoring emotion without insisting on factual truth.

This approach allows the person to retain the emotional meaning while loosening attachment to literal belief.

The goal is not to strip the psyche of its visions—but to awaken discernment between vision and history, between metaphor and memory.

In summary, FMS is not only a condition of cognitive error—it may also be a misdirected genius, a neuro-emotional fire that burns through reality’s veil to illuminate internal truth. As we move deeper into Part III, I explore how this phenomenon manifests in specific forms of artistry and symbolic creation.

FACES IN THE MIND: THE ARTISTIC RECALL PHENOMENON

Of all the striking features found in individuals with False Memory Syndrome (FMS), one of the most extraordinary is the capacity to vividly recall, reproduce, or fabricate human faces with remarkable realism. These faces may appear in false memories as supposed abusers, long-lost relatives, or fleeting strangers. In some cases, the person is convinced they have seen the face before; in others, they accept it as imagined yet can render it visually in intricate detail.

This phenomenon, which we term the Artistic Recall Phenomenon, stands at the intersection of visual cognition, memory distortion, and involuntary creativity. Within the psychextrics paradigm, it is not merely a curiosity but a window into the deeper neural and emotional matrices that give rise to memory, identity, and imagination.

1. The Phenomenon Described: Faces from Fiction:

Individuals across the FMS spectrum have been known to:

• Describe vivid facial features in false recollections, including eye colour, skin tone, texture, asymmetries, and micro-expressions.
• Draw or paint “remembered” faces with lifelike precision, despite lacking formal artistic training.
• Recognise faces they have “never seen before” with profound emotional certainty.
• Attach strong emotions to faces that, upon investigation, belong to people who never existed or whom they never met.

This is more than imagination—it is a conviction-laden visual construct. The face is felt, believed, and emotionally encoded, even if fabricated.

2. The Neurovisual Substrate: Face Memory and the Fusiform Gyrus:

The psychextrics analysis currently draws upon neuroscience to explain this capacity. The fusiform face area (FFA), located in the fusiform gyrus of the temporal lobe, is specialised for face recognition. In individuals with FMS, this area may show:

• Hyperactivation during internal visualisation.
• Cross-wiring with the amygdala and hippocampus, linking emotional memory with visual facial impressions.
• Neuroplastic feedback loops that reinforce facial constructs through repeated internal replay.

These neurological features are enhanced in individuals with superior face memory, a rare but recognised trait. Yet in FMS, this capacity becomes unmoored from factual memory, attaching itself to internal narratives.

3. Psychic Portraiture: Drawing from the Unseen:

A subset of individuals with FMS can reproduce faces in artistic form—through drawing, painting, or sculpting—with stunning fidelity. Often, these renderings:

• Represent people believed to have played roles in imagined events.
• Carry emotive weight, with expressions mirroring the internal state of the creator.
• Emerge spontaneously, as if “downloaded” from memory rather than consciously constructed.

This aligns with the psychextrics concept of psychic portraiture—the capacity to render internal emotional-symbolic material in visual human form. The “face in the mind” becomes not just a memory, but a vessel for emotion, identity, and myth.

In some individuals, this gift evolves into sustained artistic output. They become portrait artists, animators, or character designers, often unaware that their creativity may be rooted in a neuro-emotive anomaly.

4. False Familiarity and Prosopagnosia’s Inverse:

Just as some people suffer from prosopagnosia (face blindness), others—particularly within the FMS artistic spectrum—exhibit its inverse: hyperfamiliarity with false faces. They believe they know someone they have never met or feel emotionally connected to imagined personas.

Psychologically, this may stem from:

• Early unmet attachment needs projected onto imagined caregivers or abusers.
• Internal conflict seeking externalisation in narrative form.
• Trauma-induced emotional states requiring a “face” to embody them.

Psychextrics interprets these faces as emotion-saturated constructs, not lies or hallucinations, but symbolic extensions of internal conflict.

5. Faces as Archetypes: From Personal Memory to Myth:

In many cases, the remembered face is not a literal representation but an archetype:

• The stern father.
• The absent mother.
• The threatening stranger.
• The saviour or protector.

These archetypes surface in the mind with personalised features, merging the universal with the specific. Over time, repeated inner encounters with these faces can harden them into pseudo-memories, which are then reinforced through emotional recall.

This gives rise to the concept of mythic personification—the psyche’s attempt to resolve psychic tension by giving it a human face.

6. Artistic Channels: From Memory Error to Mastery:

For individuals on this spectrum, channeling the false but vivid facial imagery into creative practice can be both healing and revelatory. Many have gone on to:

• Produce graphic novels or visual diaries based on their inner faces.
• Create lifelike characters in film or animation.
• Use art therapy to deconstruct emotional significance embedded in each face.

When guided through psychextrics-informed therapy, the person can learn to say: “This face is not a memory—it is a message.”

The face becomes a canvas of the subconscious, not a courtroom exhibit of past truth.

7. Ethical Implications: When Faces Accuse:

This chapter must end with a sober caveat. In legal or interpersonal contexts, the internal face can become weaponised. Victims of FMS may swear under oath they saw a perpetrator’s face, despite no factual encounter.

This raises urgent questions:

• Should emotionally recalled faces be admissible evidence?
• How can therapists distinguish visionary constructs from historical recollection?
• Can trauma survivors be protected while truth is still pursued?

Psychextrics calls for nuanced protocols—recognising the sincerity of the claimant without prematurely validating the memory’s factual accuracy.

The aim is not to invalidate lived emotion, but to differentiate emotional truth from biographical truth.

In summary, the artistic recall of faces in FMS is not a trivial side effect—it is a neuro-emotive signature of a condition that operates between memory, myth, and mind. Through this lens, what appears as pathology may, under careful guidance, reveal the architecture of creative cognition.

CHAPTER 6

MNEMONIC ARTISTRY:DRAWING FROM NON-EXPERIENCE

Art has always drawn from memory. The evocative brushstroke, the detailed sculpture, the narrative canvas—all are products of recollection, observation, and imagination. But what happens when memory is not a record of the past, but a fabrication of the mind? What happens when the artist does not remember what was, but believes in what never occurred?

This is the paradox and power of Mnemonic Artistry—a phenomenon where individuals with False Memory Syndrome (FMS) produce stunningly detailed creative works drawn from non-experience. These are not exaggerations of truth, but entire mental constructs that carry the depth and emotional weight of lived events.

Within the psychextrics framework, this chapter explores how memory error becomes artistic insight, and how the imagined past can yield artistic output of profound aesthetic and psychological resonance.

1. The Mind as Studio: Fabricated Memory as Creative Source:

Traditional psychology treats memory distortion as a malfunction. But psychextrics proposes a broader model: memory is not only archival, it is also constructive—a creative act shaped by emotion, neurotype, and narrative need.

Mnemonic artistry is the outcome of this process:

• A non-event is believed to have occurred.
• It is internally re-lived, refined, emotionally coloured.
• The individual reproduces it artistically—as story, image, movement, or sound.

Though rooted in a falsehood, the artistic truth of the work may be profound. The art is not dishonest; it reflects the emotional reality of the inner world, if not its historical accuracy.

2. Emotional Precision, Factual Fiction:

FMS often involves high emotional intensity. This intensity, when combined with visual or narrative creativity, becomes a potent driver for art. Some examples include:

• A “remembered” moment of loss that never happened, rendered as a sorrowful painting.
• A joyful reunion with an imagined sibling, depicted in fiction or film.
• An architectural design of a childhood home that never existed—but feels familiar down to its wallpaper.

This paradox—emotional precision with factual fiction—highlights a psychextrics principle: truth in feeling need not imply truth in event. The memory is false, but the emotional experience is real, and thus the artwork is valid as expression.

3. The Cognitive Tools of Mnemonic Creation:

Several cognitive and neurobiological functions underpin mnemonic artistry:

• Hyperphantasia: The ability to visualise with extraordinary clarity. FMS individuals often score high on imagery vividness.
• Confabulation: The spontaneous invention of details to fill memory gaps, often unconscious and non-malicious.
• Emotional Salience Encoding: The tagging of imagined events with strong affective cues, giving them a false sense of authenticity.
• Neuroplastic Embedding: The brain’s reinforcement of the imagined memory through repetition, solidifying it as “truth.”

Together, these functions form a cognitive sketchpad from which false memories can be rendered into fully formed artistic products.

4. Testimonies of the Non-Lived: The Fictionalised Self:

Writers, playwrights, and storytellers have long admitted that their most powerful characters often come from an unknown place—“someone I’ve never met, but felt like I knew.”

In psychextrics terms, this may reflect mnemonic artistry:

• The fictionalised self tells a story it never lived.
• The self feels as though it did live it, because of emotional and visual reinforcement.
• The work produced appears autobiographical, but is in fact mythobiographical.

This is not deception. It is the artistry of inner mythology, where the self becomes both narrator and fabrication, truth-teller and myth-maker.

5. From Imagined Scenes to Technical Mastery:

Mnemonic artistry often compels individuals to develop exceptional technical skill in order to represent the vividness of their inner world:

• Artists may learn realism techniques to depict scenes never seen.
• Musicians may score pieces that express emotionally encoded “memories.”
• Filmmakers may storyboard dreamlike sequences that feel like lost footage from their life.

The inner demand for authentic rendering drives external discipline. Thus, false memory becomes a crucible for mastery.

6. Healing through Creation: A Therapeutic Channel:

In cases where FMS has caused confusion, grief, or interpersonal conflict, mnemonic artistry offers a therapeutic transmutation. Through guided artistic processes, individuals can:

• Externalise their inner imagery without validating it as fact.
• Reframe painful false memories into symbolic narratives.
• Use artistic distance to separate emotional truth from biographical fact.

This is the essence of constructive delusion—not pathological denial, but a conscious embrace of one’s inner storytelling faculty, placed in the service of healing and expression.

7. Mnemonic Artistry in the Wild: Case Examples:

• A woman who “remembered” surviving a fire she was never in created a series of sculptures in burned wood, each one embodying themes of transformation and survival.
• A man who falsely believed he had been a war photographer produced haunting oil paintings of war-torn landscapes that were later exhibited internationally for their emotional resonance.
• A non-verbal teenager with vivid but fabricated memories of ancient cultures drew historically accurate images of ceremonial dress, surprising anthropologists—despite no factual basis.

These are not random creations. They are emotive testaments to the brain’s capacity to create meaning where none was planted.

8. Ethical Distinctions: Art vs. Testimony:

It is crucial to distinguish mnemonic artistry from testimonial claims. What is appropriate in the gallery may be inappropriate in the courtroom. Psychextrics urges:

• Respect for the artist’s emotional narrative.
• Caution before treating artworks as biographical evidence.
• Awareness that profound expression may arise from profound mis-perception.

When navigated responsibly, mnemonic artistry offers the world art without accusation, expression without false witness.

In closing, mnemonic artistry reminds us that even the misfires of memory can be fertile ground for creative genius. In the mind of the FMS individual, the unreal becomes unforgettable, and the imagined becomes inspired.

MEMORY AS ART: MYTHOPOESIS AND THE FICTIONALISED SELF

To remember falsely is not merely to err—it is to imagine. And to imagine repeatedly, with emotional intensity and psychic conviction, is to enter the myth-making function of the mind.

In this chapter, I explore how the individual with False Memory Syndrome (FMS) becomes not simply a victim of error but a mythopoetic self—a creator of meaning, identity, and narrative through the raw medium of altered memory.

Through the lens of psychextrics, this chapter frames memory as an art form, and the self as a canvas upon which the stories of being are painted—not always factually, but always symbolically.

1. The Self as Myth: When Identity Is Narrative:

The human self is not a static object but a living composition of stories, images, beliefs, and remembered moments. Some are true, others embellished, and still others—particularly in the FMS spectrum—are entirely fabricated. Yet the psyche does not distinguish between them based on their factual basis, but on their symbolic coherence.

This leads to the emergence of the fictionalised self—a self composed not merely of historical experience, but of:

• Imagined events.
• Emotional interpretations.
• Internalised archetypes.
• Cultural and familial scripts.

FMS may distort the empirical record, but it can sharpen the symbolic function—the creation of internal myths that give the self meaning, purpose, and even a sense of destiny.

2. Mythopoesis: The Soul’s Narrative Architecture:

Mythopoesis, literally “myth-making,” is the innate capacity of the human psyche to create coherent symbolic stories to explain its world. This is not limited to religion or folklore—it permeates memory, especially false memory. The person with FMS often builds a life story in which:

• Traumas are mythologised as initiations.
• Imagined encounters are given heroic or tragic proportions.
• Unconscious fears or desires are encoded in memory as if they were fact.

From the psychextrics view, these are not flaws—they are evidence of the symbolic imperative. The brain does not only store experience; it seeks to transform it into story, into meaning, into myth.

3. Archetypes and Memory Templates:

FMS memory often appears to follow archetypal structures—timeless, cross-cultural patterns that repeat in dreams, myths, and literature. Psychextrics analysis reveals that false memories may unconsciously imitate:

• The abandonment story (the orphaned child).
• The persecution story (the innocent wrongly accused).
• The redemptive return (overcoming hardship and finding peace).
• The sacred wound (carrying unhealed pain as a mark of transformation).

These are not random errors—they are the soul’s templates, organising inner emotion into narrative forms. The result is a kind of internal literature, where one lives inside their own unwritten novel.

4. Symbolic Truth vs. Historical Truth:

One of the most powerful insights in psychextrics is that symbolic truth can operate independently of historical truth.

• A woman who falsely remembers being left at a train station may, in fact, be expressing an unconscious feeling of familial abandonment.
• A man who invents a story of having been saved by a dog may be constructing a symbol of loyalty missing in his early life.

The memory is not literally true, but it may be emotionally true, archetypally true, and even spiritually illuminating. In this way, FMS becomes a form of mythopoeic compensation—what was not, becomes what must be known through metaphor.

5. The Fictionalised Self in Artistic Expression:

Artists, poets, and mystics have long inhabited the fictionalised self. Many have drawn from imagined or mythic versions of their lives to create timeless work. What distinguishes the FMS artistic self is not that they lie, but that their inner world is so rich, emotionally charged, and neuroplastically embedded, it feels like lived truth.

In creative terms:

• The fictionalised self becomes the narrator of visual, musical, and literary work.
• The art may contain autobiographical tones, though the events are fictionalised.
• The audience may connect with the deep emotional undercurrent, regardless of factual basis.

Psychextrics does not pathologise this—it honours it as a function of creative consciousness. The mind, left to its own symbols, becomes its own author.

6. Dangers of Mythical Over-identification:

While mythopoesis can be creative and therapeutic, FMS also carries the risk of mythical over-identification—where the individual becomes enslaved by their own invented past:

• They may adopt a victim identity from a false trauma narrative.
• They may reject real relationships based on perceived betrayals that never occurred.
• They may resist healing, believing that their false narrative is sacred and untouchable.

This is the shadow of mnemonic myth-making—the symbolic story hardens into dogma, and the self becomes trapped in its own fiction.

Therapeutic approaches rooted in psychextrics aim not to erase the myth, but to reintegrate it consciously—to help the person see their mythopoesis as one layer of truth, not its totality.

7. Art as Mirror and Mediator of the Inner Myth:

The act of creating art from false memory can serve as:

• A mirror to reflect unconscious symbolism.
• A mediator between the fictionalised self and the conscious self.
• A means to reconcile imagined pain with real healing.

Through art, the internal myth is no longer confused with fact. It becomes sacred fiction—honoured, expressed, but not mistaken for historical truth. In this space, FMS becomes not a curse, but a portal into mythic self-awareness.

8. Final Reflections: Toward a New Understanding of Memory:

The conventional view of memory as a factual archive must give way to a richer, symbolic model. Memory is not only what happened; it is what the soul needed to experience in order to become itself.

False memory, in this framework, is not merely a defect—it is a form of symbolic autobiography, a work of inner literature authored by the nervous system, sculpted by emotion, and narrated by the self in search of coherence.

In this way, the person with FMS is not only a patient but a poet, not only a sufferer but a seer, whose mis-remembered past may illuminate a deeper, mythic truth beneath the surface of lived history.

VISUAL ENCODING AND ARTISTIC PRECISION IN THE FMS-AUTISM SPECTRUM NEXUS

In the psychextrics paradigm, the interrelation between neurotype, emotion-variant expression, and cognitive architecture offers a compelling explanation for a rare but significant phenomenon: hypervisual recall, particularly the artistic ability to reproduce faces or forms from memory with extraordinary precision.

This chapter explores how a subset of individuals within the False Memory Syndrome (FMS) spectrum—especially those overlapping with traits seen within the spectrum of high-functioning autism—exhibit a type of memory that is not merely erroneous or symbolic, but visual-exact, bordering on photographic or eidetic. These individuals are not just mis-remembering events—they are reconstructing with uncanny fidelity what they perceive, despite the potential unreliability of verbal or narrative memory.

1. The Psychextrics Model: Neurotype, Emotion, and Visual Dominance:

In psychextrics, neurotype is seen as a genetically and functionally distinct cognitive-emotional blueprint that governs how sensory data is processed, encoded, and retrieved. For some neurotypes—particularly visual-dominant types—the interaction between emotional valence and cognitive input leads to:

• Heightened visual encoding,
• Spatial retention over verbal abstraction,
• Emotion-tagged image storage,
• Selective hyperplasticity in occipital-parietal brain networks.

In individuals on the FMS spectrum, particularly those with co-occurring traits of autism spectrum conditions (ASC), this results in:

• Reduced narrative reliability, yet
• Increased visual precision.

Such individuals may mis-remember events while perfectly reproducing the face of a person they encountered in that event. The paradox becomes clear: factual memory can be distorted while visual encoding remains intact—or even superhuman.

2. False Memory and Visual Truth: A Functional Split:

This divergence—between false narrative memory and accurate visual memory—can be understood in psychextrics as a functional split between the linguistic-narrative cortex and the visuo-spatial cortex. Trauma or emotional imprinting can dysregulate the hippocampal-verbal axis (increasing susceptibility to false memory), while simultaneously enhancing neuroplastic reinforcement in visual areas due to:

• Emotional salience,
• Repetition,
• Obsessive visual fixation (often seen in ASC),
• Compensatory enhancement in under-social neurotypes.

Thus, in some FMS subjects, the brain replaces missing narrative coherence with hyper-detailed visual impressions, making artistic reproduction of memory a compensatory skill—one rooted in perceptual truth, if not in historical accuracy.

3. High-Functioning Autism and Memory Perception Convergence:

The spectrum of FMS overlaps significantly with aspects of high-functioning autism, including:

• Difficulty in autobiographical narrative coherence,
• Hyperfocus on details rather than holistic context,
• Enhanced pattern recognition,
• Atypical emotional processing.

This convergence results in the emergence of visual savant-like abilities in some FMS-ASC profiles. What is often dismissed as peripheral in autism becomes central in FMS when it is understood psychextrically: the neurological architecture favours precision in seeing and reproducing, not necessarily in remembering conventionally.

The result: artistic recall without lived narrative context—a person may be able to draw a stranger’s face after a brief glance, even if they cannot accurately describe who the person was, why they were there, or what they said.

4. Psychextrics Spectrum Placement: The Artistic Neurotype:

Psychextrics allows for a stratified mapping of neurotypes across:

• Memory axis (narrative vs sensory),
• Emotion axis (reactive vs contemplative),
• Cognitive-processing axis (sequential vs simultaneous).

The artistic neurotype within the FMS spectrum is often:

• Visually-simultaneous, able to hold an entire visual field in mind,
• Emotionally contemplative, using inner affect to enhance image resonance,
• Narratively impaired, resulting in confabulated or fictionalised personal histories.

Such individuals may possess:

• Involuntary visual recall (faces, places, forms),
• High-fidelity memory without temporal or contextual accuracy,
• Ability to transpose image into drawn form with minimal distortion.

This constitutes a form of mnemonic translation rather than retrieval—image becomes art, not record.

5. Theoretical Implications: When False Memory Enables Artistic Truth:

Rather than view this condition as merely pathological, psychextrics reframes it as an adaptive divergence—a neurological strategy wherein visual memory serves not simply as data storage, but as a medium of emotional processing and identity expression.

These implications are profound:

• FMS may enable a class of visual-artistic savants not fully explained by ASD or traditional art education.
• False memory may suppress temporal accuracy but amplify spatial accuracy.
• Artistic reproduction becomes truthful in form, if not in content—what was drawn may not have “happened,” but it was seen.

This phenomenon aligns with the symbolic compensation theory in psychextrics: the psyche, when denied narrative coherence, seeks equilibrium through visual-expressive truth.

6. Practical Applications and Future Inquiry:

Understanding this neurodivergent overlap offers:

• New diagnostic criteria for FMS subtypes with artistic expression,
• Insight into the relationship between memory, art, and emotion,
• Therapeutic approaches that harness visual strengths (e.g., art therapy, memory-mapping through drawing),
• Early childhood identification of visual-neurotype FMS individuals for support rather than suppression.

Further research must explore:

• The occipito-parietal connectivity in FMS-artistic types,
• Emotional encoding during visual fixation episodes,
• Cross-cultural patterns in visual recall abilities and symbolic expression.

Closing Reflection:

The Image that Outlives the Story

In the end, the image remembered may be more enduring than the event forgotten. In the FMS-autism visual spectrum, the face becomes more than a face—it becomes an echo of a psychic moment, a truth encoded in form rather than in story.

Through the psychextrics lens, these individuals are not just remembering falsely—they are seeing with a depth that transcends narrative. Their memory is not a mirror, but a painting: not literal, but vivid; not accurate, but expressive; not reliable, but radiant with inner vision.

CHAPTER 7

THERAPEUTIC ANCHORING: TOOLS TO SEPARATE FACT FROM FICTION

False Memory Syndrome (FMS) presents a clinical paradox: the mind fabricates while simultaneously believing. For individuals navigating the condition, healing does not require the erasure of memory, but the development of what psychextrics calls therapeutic anchoring—a practice that grounds memory in reality without stripping the psyche of its imaginative depth.

In this chapter, I introduce psychextrics strategies for separating fact from fiction—not by suppression or confrontation, but through a gentle, participatory process of cognitive stabilisation, emotional regulation, and memory cartography. These tools are aimed at restoring internal clarity and external trust, helping individuals navigate the ambiguity of their inner narratives.

1. The Psychextrics Premise: Anchoring without Erasure:

In traditional psychiatric models, the tendency is to confront false memories as pathological content to be corrected or erased. Psychextrics takes a more nuanced approach. It recognizes that even false memories contain emotional truths and symbolic weight. Therapeutic anchoring, then, is not about destroying memory—it is about grounding it.

Therapeutic anchoring is the process of:

• Identifying emotional markers in a memory,
• Testing for factual corroboration,
• Differentiating emotional truth from historical reality,
• And assigning status tags to memories (e.g., “confirmed,” “uncertain,” “symbolic”).

The result is a clarified inner landscape—not necessarily stripped of fiction, but oriented in reality-awareness.

2. Memory Anchors: Internal and External Techniques:

Psychextrics interventions divide memory anchors into two categories:

A. Internal Anchors

These are self-reflective mechanisms that support reality testing:

• Emotional Audit Logs: Journaling memories alongside how they feel, not just what they say. Patterns of emotional exaggeration often point to constructed memory.
• Somatic Checkpoints: Using the body to verify memory resonance. False memories often lack somatic imprint (e.g., no physical sensations during recall).
• Symbolic Decoding: Interpreting the metaphorical meaning of false memories—what they represent, rather than what they recount.

B. External Anchors

These are grounding mechanisms based in objective input:

• Reality Checkpoints: Cross-referencing memories with trusted individuals or documented records.
• Chronological Mapping: Building personal memory timelines to detect inconsistency.
• Narrative Cohesion Testing: Comparing the structure of the memory to known psychological patterns (false memories often have thematic but not temporal coherence).

These tools help the individual become a cartographer of their own mind, placing markers where memory diverges from truth.

3. Anchoring without Trauma: Gentle Separation Protocols:

One of the dangers in confronting false memories is the psychological backlash that may occur if an individual feels “disbelieved” or “invalidated.” Therefore, anchoring must be gentle, non-coercive, and emotionally safe.

Psychextrics protocols include:

• Dual-Memory Framing: Allowing the person to hold two versions of a memory—the emotional and the factual—without forcing resolution.
• Safety Anchors: Associating corrected memories with calming rituals or personal symbols (e.g., placing a stone on a timeline).
• Memory Dialogue: Writing letters between the “false remembering self” and the “present self,” creating internal integration instead of erasure.

The goal is coexistence before correction—respecting the psyche’s need to protect itself through memory fabrication before offering new scaffolds.

4. Therapist Roles in the Anchoring Process:

In the psychextrics model, the therapist is not a judge but a memory companion. Their role is to:

• Help the individual map their memory terrain,
• Offer emotional translation of symbolic memories,
• Introduce factual checks gently,
• And co-create rituals of grounding.

This shifts therapy from confrontation to collaboration, creating a participatory model of healing in which the client remains an active agent in their own narrative recalibration.

5. Digital Anchors and Future Tools:

In a digital age, therapeutic anchoring can extend beyond the clinic. Some potential interventions include:

• Personal Memory Apps that allow tagging, rating, and cross-checking of memories over time.
• Virtual Reality (VR) Simulations to safely explore symbolic memory environments.
• Emotion-Memory Trackers that help individuals associate recurring emotions with memory distortions.

These tools, used ethically and non-invasively, can offer support for those navigating the blurred terrain of real and false recall.

6. The Anchored Self: Empowerment through Clarity:

To be anchored is not to be perfect in memory. It is to be conscious in recollection, capable of distinguishing emotional storytelling from lived experience. The psychextrics approach values clarity without punishment, and truth without invalidation.

An anchored self is:

• Self-aware, recognising memory’s unreliability,
• Symbolically literate, understanding the deeper meaning of false memories,
• Grounded, maintaining internal coherence even amidst confusion,
• And empowered, no longer hostage to unconscious confabulations.

Therapeutic anchoring gives the individual back their authorship—not to rewrite history falsely, but to narrate it truthfully, symbolically, and whole.

NARRATIVE RECALIBRATION AND PARTICIPATORY MEMORY RECONSTRUCTION

False Memory Syndrome (FMS) challenges not only the accuracy of memories, but the architecture of the self. Memory is not merely a database—it is a story. Every human being constructs their identity through an evolving autobiography. In FMS, that autobiography becomes distorted. Yet within this distortion lies an opportunity: the possibility to recalibrate the narrative and rebuild memory as a participatory, healing process.

Psychextrics introduces a transformative intervention called Narrative Recalibration—a therapeutic and creative method that empowers individuals to re-author their internal stories with both honesty and compassion. It does not seek to “erase” false memories but to reposition them within a clearer, more integrated self-narrative. This section explores the theory, methods, and potential of narrative recalibration as a path to healing.

1. The Self as Story: Narrative Identity in Psychextrics:

In psychextrics, the self is a dynamic narrative system—memories are episodes, emotions are tonal shifts, and beliefs are plotlines. The psyche’s function is not just to remember, but to organise meaningfully. FMS disrupts this function by inserting emotional narratives unmoored from factual experience. These insertions often serve protective or compensatory functions, becoming embedded not through truth, but through emotional resonance.

Narrative recalibration recognises that:

• False memories often fill symbolic or psychic gaps,
• These memories become emotionally indispensable even if untrue,
• The goal is not destruction, but integration and reframing.

2. Participatory Reconstruction: Co-Authoring Memory with Consciousness:

Traditional therapeutic models treat the client as a subject to be “treated.” Psychextrics repositions the client as an active co-author in their own cognitive reconstruction. This process, called participatory memory reconstruction, invites individuals to:

• Revisit core memories (true and false),
• Examine the emotional or symbolic roles those memories play,
• Identify thematic disruptions in their life narrative,
• And rewrite or reframe those memories within a coherent, reality-anchored story.

This method doesn’t require denying memory—it requires contextualising it.

3. The Three Phases of Narrative Recalibration:

Psychextrics practitioners guide clients through a structured process:

Phase 1: Memory Mapping:

• Charting personal timelines using both remembered and uncertain events.
• Tagging memories as confirmed, contested, emotionally symbolic, or unknown.
• Identifying “narrative fractures” where false memories disrupted continuity.

Phase 2: Emotional Translation:

• Understanding what the false memory is doing emotionally.

• Is it protecting the psyche?
• Is it expressing unmet need or trauma?
• Is it creating a compensatory identity?
• Translating the symbolic weight of these memories into verbal or creative form (writing, drawing, metaphor).

Phase 3: Narrative Weaving:

• Constructing a coherent life story that includes factual anchors, emotional truths, and symbolic reflections.
• Placing false memories as mythopoetic elements rather than factual records.
• Creating future-forward narratives that no longer depend on false anchors for emotional cohesion.

4. Case Model: A Participatory Reconstruction in Practice:

Consider a client who recalls repeated abuse by a teacher in early childhood—a memory later found to be factually impossible, though it felt real for decades. Rather than dismissing the memory, psychextrics reconstruction would ask:

• What emotion or fear did this memory express?
• What void in personal narrative did it fill?
• What does this story symbolise about power, vulnerability, and betrayal?

Through guided exploration, the client may realise the memory represented a broader childhood fear of abandonment or adult authority. Rewriting the narrative involves repositioning this symbolic content: “I felt unprotected. I feared being invisible. I created a memory that validated that pain.”

The result is not erasure—but truthful integration.

5. Narrative Therapy vs. Narrative Recalibration:

While narrative therapy has been widely used in psychotherapy, psychextrics narrative recalibration distinguishes itself by:

• Combining neurotype awareness with narrative identity,
• Actively tagging memory reliability levels,
• Using mythological and artistic framing to reclassify false memories,
• Treating the individual as a sacred storybearer rather than a malfunctioning archive.

This creates a mythopoetic realism—a life story that is emotionally and cognitively honest, even when acknowledging the presence of errors or fabrications.

6. Tools of the Recalibrator: Techniques and Mediums:

Narrative recalibration can be practiced using various modalities:

• Memory Mapping Journals: Visual timelines with emotion-based annotations.
• Symbolic Rewrites: Fictionalised memoirs or myth-stories that translate trauma into metaphor.
• Dialogical Scripts: Written dialogues between past selves, future selves, and memory constructs.
• Role Recasting: Reimagining one’s identity as a protagonist who survives distortion and learns to see.

These tools turn memory work into a creative healing ritual.

7. Risks and Ethical Considerations:

In recalibrating memory, we must tread ethically. There is a danger of over-fictionalising real experiences or minimising valid trauma. Therapists and clients must:

• Anchor reinterpretation in verified facts when available,
• Avoid romanticising or spiritualising harm,
• Uphold the dignity of the individual’s emotional truth even when factual correction is needed.

The process is not about deception, but discernment.

8. The Empowered Narrator: From Victim to Visionary:

At the heart of narrative recalibration is a transformation: the individual ceases to be a passive sufferer of false memory and becomes an intentional narrator of their life.

This empowered self:

• Accepts the presence of false memories without shame,
• Understands their psychic function,
• And builds a coherent life story where pain, error, imagination, and healing coexist.

The psyche becomes not a courtroom of truth or lies, but a sacred archive of symbolic resonance and evolving identity.

CHAPTER 8

MINDSCAPING: PSYCHEXTRICS INTERVENTIONS

FOR MEMORY CORRECTION

The psyche does not forget—it reconfigures. False Memory Syndrome (FMS) reveals this reconfiguration at its most intricate, where recollection becomes reconstruction and internal reality overtakes external fact. To correct memory distortions without violence to the mind, a new approach is needed—one that does not wage war on imagination, but cultivates and prunes it like a sacred garden.

This chapter introduces Mindscaping, a central praxis in psychextrics therapy, built upon the premise that memory can be tended, reshaped, and harmonised through intentional neuro-emotional interventions. Rather than surgically removing false memories, mindscaping gently reorients the cognitive landscape, allowing fact and fiction to be separated, contextualised, and transformed.

1. What Is Mindscaping?

In the psychextrics model, mindscaping refers to the process of re-landscaping the memory-field using methods that integrate:

• Neuroplastic adaptation,
• Emotional patterning,
• Narrative revision,
• Symbolic visualisation.

Like an artist tending a canvas, or a farmer reshaping terrain, the individual—guided by a practitioner—learns to sculpt their own memory architecture with awareness and control. False memories are not “deleted”; they are redirected, reclassified, and de-charged from central identity roles.

Mindscaping is especially useful for FMS cases where:

• The false memory has deep emotional weight,
• The individual is aware of the unreliability but still affected,
• Previous therapeutic attempts failed due to identity attachment to the false event.

2. The Memory Field: Terrain, Structures, and Shadows:

To begin mindscaping, one must first envision the memory field. Psychextrics posits that memory exists in the psyche as a multi-dimensional terrain:

• Pathways (neural circuits of frequent recall),
• Structures (core memories tied to identity),
• Echo Chambers (repeated emotional patterns),
• Shadows (repressed or uncertain content),
• Gardens (positive, life-affirming experiences).

False memories tend to appear as unnatural overgrowths or displaced monuments—imposing structures in the wrong soil, out of scale with the surrounding terrain.

Mindscaping requires identifying:

• Which memories are invasive or dominating,
• What purpose they serve in the landscape,
• And where new growth is needed.

3. The Four Modes of Mindscaping:

There are four main intervention methods used in mindscaping, each targeting a different aspect of memory correction:

A. Displacement Mapping

Identifies and gently relocates the emotional energy of a false memory to a symbolic or non-literal structure. For example, a fabricated abuse memory may be reframed as a metaphor for an era of voicelessness.

B. Construct Declassification

Reduces the power of a false memory by reclassifying it from “experienced truth” to “emotional narrative.” This often involves ritualised re-labelling, such as journal entries titled “This Memory Is a Message, Not a Moment.”

C. Neural Re-Routing

Uses guided visualisation and neuro-linguistic triggers to weaken the automatic neural pathways that recall a false event. Techniques include:

• Pattern interruption,
• Alternative sensory pairing (e.g., associating the false memory with an abstract image rather than a narrative),
• Auditory affirmation loops to strengthen corrected memory versions.

D. Mythic Absorption

Integrates the false memory into a mythopoetic personal mythology. This is reserved for cases where the memory carries enduring symbolic value. Rather than deny it, the memory is given mythic form, such as “the inner child who created the sentinel dream.”

4. Tools and Techniques:

Psychextrics mindscaping employs both practical and esoteric instruments:

• Memory Terrain Maps: Visual grids where clients plot life events, scaled by certainty, emotion, and frequency of recall.
• Construct Tokens: Physical objects representing specific memory types, used in ritualised therapy to “move” memories between symbolic zones.
• Dream Grafting: The conscious insertion of corrected memory elements into recurring dreams or daydream scripts to retrain unconscious processing.
• Affirmation Reseeding: Writing and repeating core affirmations like: “I honour my emotions without rewriting my past.”

Mindscaping also encourages sound-based and olfactory interventions, as sensory anchors can help establish new associations to rebalanced narratives.

5. Mindscaping in FMS-Autism Spectrum Intersections:

Individuals with co-occurring FMS traits and high-functioning autism often possess heightened visual memory and structured pattern recognition. This can be both a gift and a vulnerability for those on the FMS: hyper-visual minds may build exact replicas of events that never occurred, yet hold to them with unshakable conviction.

Mindscaping helps such individuals by:

• Respecting their need for order and clarity,
• Giving structured visual tools (e.g., mind maps, symbol keys),
• Offering literal explanations for abstract therapeutic goals,
• And creating “safe zones” in the mental terrain where truths and non-truths can be held without conflict.

The goal is not to impose new narratives, but to empower internal discernment.

6. Ethical Dimensions of Mindscaping:

Memory correction walks a fine line between healing and manipulation. Psychextrics principles require that all mindscaping interventions:

• Be client-driven,
• Avoid absolute assertions of truth unless evidence is clear,
• Honour the symbolic meaning of memory content,
• And be guided by consent, transparency, and compassion.

False memories are not moral failings—they are misdirected adaptations. Correcting them should be an act of liberation, not accusation.

7. Healing the Garden of the Mind:

As mindscaping progresses, the memory terrain becomes more coherent, nourishing, and peaceful. The psyche no longer hosts haunting false events but rather healed metaphors, integrated wisdom, and clarified stories.

Some clients are expected to report:

• Decreased emotional reactivity to false memories,
• Ability to articulate truth and symbol side by side,
• Renewed creativity, as cognitive resources once trapped in illusion are freed.

Psychextrics mindscaping is not about returning to an ideal “true self.” It is about cultivating the conscious self—one who knows their garden, tends its borders, and chooses which seeds to water.

TOWARD ETHICAL USE OF CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY IN THERAPY

In the fragile terrain of the human psyche, memory is not simply recalled—it is assembled, interpreted, and often revised. Therapeutic work that engages with memory, especially in cases of False Memory Syndrome (FMS), must navigate a profound ethical dilemma: when is reconstruction healing, and when is it harm?

In a psychextrics framework, where emotional truths and neural patterns shape lived perception, the question becomes not only how to help someone remember, but how to ensure that the reconstruction of memory aligns with both integrity and compassion.

This chapter examines the ethical dimensions of memory work, particularly in relation to constructive memory interventions—those therapies that engage the client in actively re-authoring, revising, or transforming their memories as part of healing. From trauma-focused reprocessing to symbolic reframing and narrative therapy, we explore the delicate line between healing construction and deceptive implantation.

1. The Constructive Nature of Memory:

Memory is not a filing cabinet of static facts; it is a narrative system that reactivates and reshapes experience with every recall. In neuroscience, this is known as reconsolidation—each retrieval of a memory opens a window where the memory can be altered, for better or worse.

For those with FMS, this natural reconstructive tendency is hyperactive. They may create detailed recollections of events that never occurred, often layered with intense emotional charge. Therapeutic intervention cannot simply focus on “erasing” such memories—it must recognise that memory is functional, adaptive, and meaning-laden, even when false.

The ethical challenge is: how do we use memory’s plasticity to heal, without abusing its vulnerability?

2. The Danger of Imposed Narratives:

At the heart of FMS is the risk of external narrative imposition. Suggestive questioning, unchecked affirmations, or therapist-led interpretations can all implant or reinforce false memories, especially when:

• The client is emotionally fragile,
• The therapeutic relationship is hierarchical or authoritative,
• There is a bias toward locating trauma as the root of all symptoms.

Well-intentioned therapists can unintentionally colonise the client’s memory field, shaping recall based on archetypes, cultural tropes, or personal expectations. The danger is most acute when:

• The therapist “discovers” past abuse or trauma through leading questions,
• Vivid imagery or dream recall is treated as literal memory,
• Emotional resonance is taken as proof of factuality.

Such practices violate the core psychextrics ethic: that the internal world is sacred and must be navigated with reverence.

3. The Ethics of Memory Re-authoring:

Memory re-authoring is a common and often therapeutic technique. It involves inviting the client to reinterpret or revise past experiences, often to:

• Shift the emotional impact,
• Reclaim agency,
• Extract meaning from pain.

But in FMS contexts, this must be handled with heightened care. Psychextrics ethics propose four guiding principles for memory re-authoring:

A. Transparent Intent: The client must know exactly what the intervention is for. Language like “reimagining,” “symbolic retelling,” or “emotional metaphor” should be explicit.

B. Co-Creation: The client must be an active, willing participant—not merely responding to a therapist’s suggestion, but generating the narrative collaboratively.

C. Multivalency: No memory is treated as absolute. The client is encouraged to hold multiple truths: literal, emotional, symbolic, and imagined—without needing to collapse them into one definitive account.

D. Anchoring: Revised narratives are always anchored to known truths—relationships, timelines, physical evidence—so that new stories don’t become new distortions.

4. Constructive Memory vs. False Memory:

The distinction between a constructive and false memory lies not just in factuality, but in function:

• A false memory distorts past reality and often hijacks identity without consent.
• A constructive memory offers interpretive insight, enabling growth, healing, or understanding, with full awareness that it may not be factually literal.

In psychextrics, we consider whether a memory is generative or pathological. A generative memory gives meaning, healing, or integration. A pathological memory causes persistent confusion, guilt, or maladaptive behaviour, especially when its origins are fictive.

Ethical therapy seeks to reduce the pathological while preserving what is generative, even when born from distortion.

5. Therapeutic Consent in Memory Work:

In all memory-related therapy, especially with FMS clients, consent must be dynamic, ongoing, and informed. This includes:

• Regular check-ins about memory certainty,
• Clear boundaries between metaphor and fact,
• Empowering the client to pause or question interpretations,
• Allowing emotional truths to stand without enforcing historical verification.

Therapists should avoid using language such as:

• “You must have blocked it out.”
• “That sounds like trauma to me.”
• “Your body remembers, even if your mind doesn’t.”

Instead, preferred psychextrics approaches would say:

• “Let’s explore what this image means to you.”
• “There’s emotion here—what might it be pointing toward?”
• “We can hold the possibility without needing certainty.”

6. Ethical Use of Imaginal Tools:

Dreams, art, metaphor, and guided imagery are powerful psychextrics tools. But they can also blur the boundary between felt truth and historical fact. An ethical therapist should:

• Use these tools as windows, not proofs,
• Encourage symbolic interpretation over literalism,
• Avoid “interpreting” client material without their input.

When a client visualises a scene that feels traumatic but lacks factual corroboration, the ethical route is to honour the emotional imprint without assigning historical weight.

7. The Therapist as Witness, Not Architect:

In FMS therapy, the practitioner must never become the architect of the client’s history. The therapist is a witness, guide, and mirror—not a memory-maker. The goal is to:

• Help the client discern,
• Not declare,
• Help organise and anchor,
• Not implant or erase.

Therapeutic humility is essential. The most ethical memory work often ends not with “this is what happened,” but with “this is what I carry, and this is how I choose to hold it.”

8. Toward a Compassionate Memory Ethic:

Memory is sacred. It contains pain, possibility, and meaning. In FMS work, we must resist the temptation to demand factual purity or enforce healing scripts. Instead, we offer safety, tools, co-authorship, and truthfulness—not to correct the self, but to empower it.

Psychextrics ethics remind us that even when memories are false, the pain they reflect is real—and so is the potential for redemption.

In this way, therapy becomes not a courtroom for fact, but a sanctuary for self-exploration—where memory is not a cage, but a canvas.

REFRAMING THE NARRATIVE: FROM SYNDROME TO GIFT

False Memory Syndrome (FMS), in its conventional framing, is often treated as a pathology—a cognitive glitch, a neuropsychological error, a distortion to be diagnosed and corrected. But this pathologising lens, while useful for clinical clarity, also narrows the existential potential of those who live with FMS.

In the psychextrics framework, which prioritises both the neurotype-emotion matrix and the adaptive potential of cognitive divergence, FMS is not merely a disorder—it is a creative window, a neurological gift wrapped in vulnerability.

This chapter proposes a radical reframing: that False Memory Syndrome, when understood through the lens of neurodiversity and narrative potential, is not solely a deficit but a latent gift of the imaginative mind. The aim is not to romanticise distress, but to liberate those diagnosed with FMS from shame, while offering new pathways for healing, self-discovery, and purpose.

1. The Gift Within the Distortion:

At first glance, FMS seems purely destructive: it erodes trust, disrupts relationships, and disorients the self. But hidden within these disruptions are capacities rarely seen in the general population:

• Hypervisualisation – the ability to render rich, complex scenes in the mind.
• Emotional synaesthesia – memory events imbued with heightened affective texture.
• Narrative fluidity – a flexible identity structure capable of rapid adaptation and mythopoeic invention.

These traits, when misunderstood, produce suffering. But when harnessed—through art, therapy, storytelling, and emotional literacy—they can become gifts of insight, empathy, and creative power.

The psychextrics view recognises that the brain does not malfunction randomly. If the mind confabulates, it does so with an internal logic—one driven by emotional need, neurotype alignment, and psychic integration. What appears as a falsehood may be a symbolic truth, seeking a voice.

2. Reclaiming the Narrative:

A person living with FMS is often burdened with doubt, accused (even by themselves) of lying, fantasising, or betraying loved ones. This narrative—of being “broken,” “untrustworthy,” or “mentally ill”—can create deeper psychic damage than the memory distortions themselves.

The psychextrics response is to interrupt this narrative and offer a new one:

“Your mind is not broken. It is expressing a truth through images that language has not yet reached.”

Reframing begins by narrative reversal: transforming the story of pathology into one of purpose. This is not denial of harm but a re-storying of identity. FMS becomes not a syndrome to be hidden, but a lens through which unseen truths are glimpsed—the emotional, archetypal, symbolic truths that shape every life.

3. The Role of the FMS-Savant:

Within the spectrum of FMS, there are individuals who exhibit extraordinary memory construction abilities—people who can recreate detailed scenes they never lived, recall facial features with artistic exactness, or generate autobiographical plots with literary precision. These individuals may be described as FMS-savants—not in the sense of infallible intellect, but in their unique ability to synthesise emotional landscapes into cognitive architectures.

In psychextrics, this ability is not dismissed as delusion, but recognised as a form of symbolic cognition. These minds do not remember what happened; they remember what could have happened, what felt like it happened, or what needed to happen for the psyche to survive.

Such a capacity makes them uniquely:

• Empathic storytellers,
• Mythmakers,
• Emotional translators,
• Visionary artists.

4. Embracing the Fictionalised Self:

Many therapeutic models aim to correct the false self by anchoring the client in an objective, factual identity. Psychextrics, by contrast, embraces the fictionalised self as a necessary artistic construct—one that evolves to make sense of inner and outer chaos.

This fictional self is not inauthentic; it is adaptive. It is the self imagined for survival, dreamed into being to hold what reality could not contain. Recognising this self is not regression—it is maturation. The client learns to:

• Distinguish the myth from the memory,
• Hold both as valid aspects of personal meaning,
• Reclaim authorship over their internal world.

From this integration arises a post-FMS identity: not one free from confusion, but one liberated from shame, where memory becomes a fluid canvas, not a rigid ledger.

5. Reframing in Practice: Tools and Language:

To enact this reframing, therapists and guides must adopt new language and metaphors that honour the depth of the FMS experience. Examples include:

• “Emotional memory” instead of “false memory,”
• “Symbolic recall” instead of “fabrication,”
• “Psychic archetype” instead of “delusion,”
• “Narrative protector” instead of “fantasist.”

These terms foster dignity and space for exploration, while also helping the individual to differentiate layers of truth: literal, emotional, symbolic, ancestral, and imagined.

Tools for this include:

• Storyweaving – helping clients reframe memories as mythic expressions,
• Reality anchoring – identifying what can be confirmed and what remains symbolic,
• Creative externalisation – turning memories into poems, drawings, or scripts to process them non-literally,
• Memory dialogues – allowing the “false” and “true” selves to converse without shame.

6. From Syndrome to Sovereignty:

Ultimately, reframing the narrative of FMS is about sovereignty: the right to own one’s mental architecture without punitive labels. Psychextrics proposes that truth is multidimensional, and healing is not the erasure of confusion, but the integration of contradiction.

To live with FMS is to walk between worlds: between the factual and the felt, the past and the imagined. But this in-between place is not exile—it is initiation.

When the individual reclaims their imaginative power, grounds it in ethical self-reflection, and uses it for artistic or empathetic purpose, the syndrome becomes a vocation.

7. A New Lexicon of Memory:

Let us retire the stigma of “false” and adopt a lexicon more attuned to the complexity of human cognition. In the psychextrics tradition, we no longer ask:

• “Is it real?” But instead:
• “What does it mean?”
• “Where does it lead?”
• “What is it trying to heal?”

By asking these questions, we cease to reduce memory to mere fact. We begin to understand memory as mythos, as medicine, and ultimately, as a mirror of the soul’s deepest truths.

In this final act of reframing, the person with FMS is no longer a passive subject of disorder—but a narrative alchemist. Their story—once fractured—is now reassembled not as a cautionary tale, but as a song of survival, a testament to the power of imagination, and a reminder that reality itself is always partly invented.

CHAPTER 9

THE PSYCHEXTRICS MAP OF MEMORY: A NEW DIAGNOSTIC FRONTIER

In the study of False Memory Syndrome (FMS), conventional diagnostic models have long relied on behavioral observations, subjective accounts, and therapeutic interviews. While these tools offer valuable insights, they fail to capture the deep architecture of the mind’s memory-making machinery.

Psychextrics offers a bold new frontier—a map of memory that is both diagnostic and developmental, grounded in the interplay of neurotype, emotional encoding, and the psyche’s intrinsic impulse toward narrative integration.

Memory

As a Psychextrics Organ

In psychextrics theory, memory is not a static archive but a living, generative organ of identity. It filters perception, negotiates trauma, and forecasts meaning. FMS arises when this organ becomes hyper-constructive—overactive in its need to reconcile emotional inputs, sensory fragments, and internal archetypes into coherent stories. Rather than viewing false memory as an aberration, psychextrics sees it as a byproduct of memory’s creative function running unchecked or in maladaptive loops.

To map this, we begin by examining the neuro-emotive signature—a composite of a person’s cognitive wiring, emotional processing pattern, and memory structure. These signatures allow clinicians to see not just that a person “remembers falsely,” but how and why those memory formations were constructed in the first place.

The Three Psychextrics Axes

Of Memory

A new diagnostic model within psychextrics introduces three axes to map memory formation and distortion:

1. Neurotype Axis (Wiring and Input Sensitivity): This axis evaluates the neurological architecture underpinning memory function. Is the individual a visual-dominant memoriser? Do they exhibit hyperplastic or rigid memory networks? Certain neurotypes—particularly those associated with high-functioning autism or synaesthetic perception—demonstrate heightened encoding of environmental input, contributing to both hyperreal recall and susceptibility to memory blending.
2. Emotion Axis (Encoding Intensity and Narrative Adhesion): Emotions bind memories to meaning. The emotional axis assesses how strongly an event is encoded based on affective intensity. In many FMS cases, emotions are borrowed or imposed—such as in instances of trauma narrative implantation—causing otherwise neutral experiences to become emotionally “tagged” and remembered as if significant or traumatic.
3. Constructive Axis (Narrative Compulsion and Cognitive Filling): This evaluates how the psyche attempts to complete incomplete data through imagination or internal story-building. It is along this axis that confabulation, defensive imagination, and trauma-repair narratives most often form. Individuals high on this axis tend to fill memory gaps with plausible sequences, especially if doing so resolves emotional tension.

By triangulating these three axes, a clinician or researcher can create a psychextrics memory profile—a diagnostic snapshot of where a person sits on the memory distortion spectrum, what types of interventions may be most effective, and what capacities they may unconsciously possess.

Spectrum Zones

In the Psychextrics Map

The psychextrics map also divides the memory distortion experience into five spectrum zones:

1. Zone I – Sensory Anchored Recall: Memory remains largely grounded in real events but is intensified in detail and emotion. These individuals often have photographic recall, particularly for faces or places, and rarely question their memories—even when subtly altered.
2. Zone II – Interpretive Memory Bias: Events are real, but interpretations become distorted. Over time, the meaning assigned to an experience becomes more emotionally charged than the event itself, resulting in a memory that feels different from what occurred.
3. Zone III – Blended Constructs: Real and imagined events fuse. This zone includes individuals who vividly recall events that were told to them or dreamt, eventually believing them to be real through repetition or internal reinforcement.
4. Zone IV – Defensive Narratives: False memories emerge to defend the psyche from deeper trauma. These narratives often involve trauma displacement, where the memory serves as a substitute or mask for more painful truths.
5. Zone V – Fictionalised Identity Loops: This advanced zone occurs when the individual develops identity constructs around fabricated memories. These cases are most concerning when they impact social or legal functioning, but also offer insight into how reality can be entirely rewritten in the psyche.

Toward an Empathic

Diagnostic Culture

The psychextrics approach reframes diagnosis not as a judgment of mental error but as a map of adaptive strategies. False memory is not pathology alone—it is a clue to how the mind is trying to make sense of experience, often in response to emotional imbalance, suggestive environments, or identity fragility.

Understanding the memory profile of an individual allows therapists to engage memory with precision, whether through grounding exercises, narrative recalibration, trauma decoding, or creative outlet redirection.

In advanced cases, tools like memory sculpting, participatory story revision, or dream-state re-anchoring can help individuals step out of their loops without invalidating the internal logic behind their distortions.

The Diagnostic

Horizon

The future of memory science lies not in attempting to trap memory in objectivity, but in learning to read its symbolic and structural language. Psychextrics offers such a language—one that honours the complex nexus of neurotype, emotion, imagination, and story.

Through its diagnostic frontier, FMS is no longer merely a disorder to be corrected—it becomes a key to unlocking the psyche’s hidden cartography, a map of where the mind has been, what it wishes to conceal, and what it most deeply seeks to express.

MEMORY ENGINEERING AND NEURO-ETHICAL BOUNDARIES

As the field of psychextrics advances, the capacity to intervene in memory formation—not only retrospectively, but proactively—becomes a tangible reality. With tools ranging from suggestive therapy, guided dreamscaping, pharmacological modulation, and emerging neurotechnologies like non-invasive brain stimulation, the line between natural memory and engineered memory is dissolving.

This prompts a necessary and urgent discussion: what are the ethical boundaries of memory manipulation, and how do we steward this knowledge without becoming the architects of synthetic lives?

The Rise

Of Memory Engineering

Memory engineering refers to the intentional design, alteration, or suppression of memories—either to heal dysfunction or enhance psychological performance. In clinical settings, this might take the form of:

• Memory dampening: where trauma-related recollections are softened through EMDR, pharmacological blockers, or hypnosis.
• Narrative re-anchoring: where false memories are replaced with structured, truthful, or metaphorically healing alternatives.
• Neurofeedback-based remapping: where patients learn to redirect neural pathways associated with painful memory activation.

In more speculative contexts, the rise of neurotechnologies may one day allow targeted editing of memory fragments, suppression of emotionally harmful recollections, or even implantation of beneficial simulations—experiences designed to build confidence, resolve trauma, or compensate for memory loss.

In the psychextrics model, these interventions are not only possible but philosophically consequential. If memory is both the architect and archive of the Self, then intervening in memory is akin to re-scripting identity at its neuro-emotional core.

The Dangers of Tampering

Without Anchoring

One of the central warnings in psychextrics theory is the risk of anchoring failure. If an individual’s revised memories—whether altered therapeutically or technologically—are not emotionally and cognitively integrated with the rest of their psyche, then fragmentation, dissociation, or even psychosis can occur. Identity becomes unmoored. The individual begins to exist in dissonant layers, each narrating a different past, each struggling for primacy.

Moreover, false confidence can emerge from positive-but-invented memories, and therapeutic deceit—even when well-intentioned—can damage long-term psychological trust.

Therefore, memory engineering must be governed by a code of memory stewardship, not manipulation. The goal is not to trick the mind into happiness but to align the inner narrative with truth, resilience, and continuity.

The Neuroethical Compass

In Psychextrics

Psychextrics proposes a set of neuroethical principles for managing memory interventions:

1. The Principle of Narrative Integrity: No intervention should fracture the individual’s sense of continuity. Even if elements are modified, the personal story must remain internally coherent, emotionally plausible, and ethically transparent.
2. The Principle of Consent and Comprehension: Memory interventions must be entered voluntarily, with full understanding of their psychological and identity implications. The brain may forget, but the psyche remembers—and consent must include that deeper level.
3. The Principle of Adaptive Truth: When confronting traumatic false memories, the goal should not be to replace with cold facts, but to construct adaptive truths—stories that heal without lying, reframe without distorting, and protect without erasing.
4. The Principle of Soul Continuity: Psychextrics affirms that memory is not merely neurological but metaphysical—a carrier of soul coherence. Interventions must preserve the thread of inner selfhood that transcends events, memories, and constructed identity.

Memory as Terrain,

Not Artifact

The modern clinical model often treats memory as something to retrieve, verify, and clean up—like an old photo album needing curation. Psychextrics rejects this reductionism. Memory is not just an archive, but a terrain. It is alive, interactive, and shaped by intention, fear, love, and meaning.

Thus, memory engineering must be approached as landscape management—less like editing film reels and more like tending a mythic forest. We do not extract and replace trees; we cultivate growth, clear harmful brush, and redirect streams to nourish desired pathways. All while respecting the ecosystem of the self.

Therapeutic

vs Malicious Engineering

A thin line separates healing intervention from psychological abuse. Just as FMS can be maliciously activated by repeated suggestion or coercive environments, so too can therapeutic tools be misused. Imagine:

• A manipulative police investigator creating false negative memories in a witness living with FMS to extract abuse allegation to add up to own conviction rate for promotion.
• A court-appointed therapist suppressing real trauma in favour of socially palatable narratives.
• A relationship partner gaslighting using pseudo-therapy language and implanted false reassurances.

Psychextrics practitioners must be vigilant. With great memory access comes great ethical burden. And the most dangerous engineer is one who believes they are right, regardless of the client’s emotional truth.

From Engineering

To Empowerment

The final aim of memory intervention should not be correction, but empowerment. Clients should emerge with enhanced capacity to interpret their memories, regulate their emotional impact, and differentiate between inner imagery and external truth. FMS, under this view, becomes not something to eliminate, but something to guide and temper—a wild creative fire that can light or consume.

By integrating memory engineering within a psychextrics framework, we shift from a model of pathology to one of sacred stewardship. The practitioner becomes not an editor of the mind, but a guardian of memory’s integrity, helping the individual not just to recall truth, but to become truth.

POST-TRAUMATIC GROWTH AND CREATIVE MEMORY PRACTICES

False Memory Syndrome (FMS), when understood solely as a pathology, risks obscuring a deeper, more powerful potential embedded in the human psyche—the capacity for post-traumatic growth. Rather than being a condition to “fix,” certain spectrums of FMS can be recontextualised as an adaptive, even creative, response to unprocessed emotional trauma. Through this reframing, the distorted memory becomes less an affliction and more a portal: a doorway into a creative memory process that can transform suffering into meaning, and confusion into coherence.

In psychextrics science, memory is not only cognitive. It is symbolic, aesthetic, and survival-driven. It paints not just what happened, but what needed to happen for the self to stay whole. The question, then, is not “What is true?” but “What is this memory trying to do?”

The Psychextrics View

Of Post-Traumatic Growth

Post-traumatic growth (PTG) refers to the profound psychological transformation that some individuals undergo following deeply distressing life events. While trauma may cause fragmentation, disorientation, and the encoding of false memories, it can also trigger:

• Existential reflection and self-renewal.
• Enhanced empathy and relational depth.
• New artistic or creative capacities.
• Heightened spiritual awareness.
• A restructured sense of meaning and priority.

In those with FMS, this growth often emerges through the same mechanism that caused dysfunction—memory reconstruction. Where traditional psychology might seek to deconstruct or purge a false narrative, psychextrics seeks to understand what that narrative is trying to integrate.

If the memory was false but the emotion was true, then it becomes a vessel for transformation. What results is not mere recovery, but a creative transcendence of trauma’s original imprint.

Fictional Memory

As a Healing Blueprint

In psychextrics terms, many false memories are not simply random confabulations—they are blueprints for healing. They offer symbolic resolutions to pain that was never properly resolved in real life. A child who falsely remembers being rescued from danger may be expressing a deep longing for safety. A survivor who recalls an encounter that never happened may be reconfiguring identity through imagined empowerment.

This phenomenon is not deception—it is mythopoeia. And in many cases, it precedes conscious healing.

Creative memory practices, then, are not about reinforcing illusions, but guiding them into meaningful artforms and therapeutic insight. Through storytelling, visual art, drama, and ritual, the imagined can become an instrument of emotional restoration.

Key Creative Practices

For FMS Transformation

1. Autobiographical Fiction Writing: Encouraging individuals to write their life stories—including known inaccuracies or fantastical elements—can provide both emotional release and symbolic clarity. The aim is not historical accuracy, but narrative wholeness.
2. Visual Art and Face Mapping: Some individuals with FMS demonstrate extraordinary abilities to recall faces or scenes with artistic precision. Encouraging drawing or face-mapping as a meditative memory retrieval method helps in differentiating the felt from the factual, while honouring the richness of visual recall.
3. Memory Theatre: Through guided role-play or theatrical enactments of remembered or imagined events, individuals can gain new perspective, emotional closure, and cognitive flexibility. The memory becomes a performance, not a prison.
4. Dream Journaling and Active Imagination: Dreams are the nightly theatre of memory distortion. Tracking dreams and engaging in Jungian-style active imagination allows the subconscious to express its memory logic without shame. The practitioner facilitates interpretation, not correction.
5. Sacred Narrative Re-Ritualisation: For those whose FMS emerged from religious or cultural trauma, psychextrics ritual provides a way to re-sanctify the memory. Through rites of release, naming, and ancestral invocation, the memory becomes part of a larger collective healing.

Psychextrics Stance:

Memory as Adaptive Evolution

Traditional views of trauma emphasise fragmentation. Psychextrics recognises that this fragmentation may, in certain neurotypes, be a form of creative reordering. It is the mind attempting to write a better story than the one life delivered. This is not delusion—it is the first step toward self-directed evolution.

False memories, in this context, are not flaws in cognition. They are prototypes—sketches of how the soul wished the world had been. When responsibly explored, they can guide both therapist and client toward unmet needs, unconscious aspirations, and hidden strengths.

From Memory Wounds

To Memory Wings

Healing in FMS is not just about memory correction. It is about memory redirection. Rather than merely erasing the erroneous, we ask: What emotional purpose did this memory serve? And how can that purpose be honoured more truthfully, yet still creatively?

Through creative practice, a person can move from haunted by a fiction to healed through an artwork. In this way, false memories are transmuted from wounds into wings.

The Alchemy

Of the Mind

Post-traumatic growth is not the absence of scars. It is the ability to use those scars as sacred maps. In the psychextrics framework, FMS becomes not a clinical aberration but a field of potential, where imagination meets emotion in the great work of inner transformation.

The invitation, then, is clear: do not fear the distortions of memory. Learn to paint with them.

For within every broken recollection lies a hidden shape—waiting not to be erased, but to be sculpted into light.

CHAPTER 10

EDUCATION, JUSTICE, AND SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF FMS

False Memory Syndrome (FMS) is not merely a clinical phenomenon; it is a societal force. When memory itself—our internal record of what was—can be erroneous, emotionally charged, and suggestible, the ripple effects touch every institution that depends on accurate recall. From schools to courtrooms, families to public discourse, FMS compels us to rethink the role of memory in justice, learning, and truth-making.

This chapter explores the psychextrics implications of FMS on education, law, and the social fabric—proposing ethical, therapeutic, and philosophical tools for managing its reach in collective settings.

Memory

As Social Currency

In any society, memory is more than personal. It becomes currency: a basis for trust, responsibility, and identity. A child’s report of abuse. A witness’s statement. A student’s version of events. A survivor’s memoir. Each of these claims draws authority from the assumption that memory is reliable.

But what happens when memory is neither reliable nor maliciously false—when it is unknowingly fabricated by neuro-emotional encoding or shaped by social suggestion?

In such cases, FMS reveals the fragile bridge between subjective truth and public consequence.

The Educational Sphere:

Memory, Shame, and Mislabeling

In educational settings, children with undiagnosed FMS traits may exhibit the following:

• Narratives that don’t match factual timelines.
• Recollections of events or punishments that never occurred.
• Repetition of fantastical or dramatic stories with conviction.
• Vivid visual recall detached from actual experience.

Too often, these children are labeled as:

• Liars.
• Attention-seekers.
• Delusional.
• Manipulative.

The psychextrics framework offers an alternative: these students may be functioning from adaptive memory constructs shaped by emotional need, neurotype, or trauma processing. Their stories may be symbolically true, even if factually skewed.

Teachers, psychologists, and caregivers must shift from punitive interpretation to interpretive listening:

• What emotional need is this memory trying to fulfill?
• What pattern of neuro-emotional encoding is at play?
• Is the child’s imagination a coping tool for chaos?

Educational policies must:

• Train staff in neurodiversity and memory science.
• Prevent the criminalisation of memory distortion.
• Allow narrative-based, not solely fact-based, developmental assessments.

In embracing such nuance, schools become spaces of integration, not interrogation.

The Justice System:

When False Memories Accuse

Nowhere is FMS more socially and ethically volatile than in the justice system. A single memory can:

• Convict a person of a crime.
• Separate a child from a parent.
• Trigger public outrage.
• Alter reputations irreparably.

Recovered memory cases, especially those involving historical abuse, have spotlighted the power and peril of relying on emotionally intense—but unverifiable—recollections. In some instances, entire prosecutions have hinged on testimonies later deemed implanted, confabulated, or therapeutically influenced.

Psychextrics does not aim to invalidate survivor claims. Rather, it introduces a dual lens:

1. Emotion is real even when memory is flawed.
2. Memory must be examined as a neuro-emotional construct, not a perfect transcript. Justice systems need:

• FMS-awareness training for judges, lawyers, and forensic psychologists.
• Protocols for differentiating trauma memory from suggestive implant.
• Inclusion of psychextrics expert testimony in memory-based cases.
• Legal safeguards against suggestive questioning in children and vulnerable adults.

The goal is not to erode memory-based justice—but to ensure it is grounded in neuroethical complexity.

Media and Public Discourse:

Viral Memories and Moral Panic

Social media has become an accelerant for collective memory distortion. Viral narratives, survivor testimonials, and political memory wars have blurred the line between:

• Experience and fabrication.
• Justice and vengeance.
• Evidence and emotional resonance.

A person with FMS traits, when placed at the centre of such a storm, may become:

• A victim of manipulation.
• A tool in ideological battles.
• Or a symbol of trauma they did not actually endure.

This does not invalidate their suffering—but it complicates the ethics of belief.

We must ask:

• Who benefits from this narrative?
• What neuropsychological patterns might explain its construction?
• Is society willing to differentiate felt truth from historical truth without shaming either?

Psychextrics calls for a deceleration of moral panic—and a turn toward slow discernment.

Social Healing and the Role

Of Collective Memory

FMS shows us that society itself can become traumatised through false collective memories: distorted histories, mythic grievances, idealised pasts. In such cases, entire cultures operate on confabulated memory, passed from generation to generation.

Psychextrics interventions here involve:

• Memory reconciliation commissions that explore emotional vs factual histories.
• Public rituals of narrative healing.
• Arts and education projects that validate symbolic memory without falsifying history.

Rather than seeking a singular truth, societies may need to build multi-perspectival memory ecologies, where:

• Stories coexist.
• Contradictions are explored, not erased.
• Healing replaces blame.

Toward an Ethic

Of Memory

False Memory Syndrome, when viewed through a psychextrics lens, is not only a clinical condition—it is a mirror held up to society. It reflects the fragility of our truth mechanisms, the danger of unchecked suggestion, and the deep human need for stories that heal.

Education must learn to listen beneath the distortion.

Justice must learn to discern without retraumatising.

Media must learn to platform without sensationalising.

And all of us must learn to respect the sacred ambiguity of memory—its emotional wisdom, its factual vulnerability, and its potential for harm and redemption alike.

In the end, the memory that never was may still teach us who we truly are—if we have the courage to listen with wonder, not fear.

THE ORACLE WITHIN: MEMORY, INTUITION, AND SACRED RECALL

There lies, within the mind, a quiet and persistent guide: a voice that knows before knowing, remembers before experience, and senses before seeing. This is the oracle within—the inner faculty that blends memory, intuition, and sacred recall. In the psychextrics view, this is not a metaphysical metaphor but a neuro-emotive construct, deeply rooted in the human experience of perception and meaning-making.

This chapter explores how False Memory Syndrome (FMS), often dismissed as error or pathology, may instead reveal a hidden architecture of intuitive cognition—a system by which the psyche forms spiritual knowledge through the convergence of emotional need, symbolic imagery, and anticipatory insight.

Intuitive Cognition

And the Psychextrics Lens

The psychextrics model proposes that memory is not linear but multi-layered and emotionally anchored, shaped by neurotype, affective tone, and imaginal fluency. Intuition, within this frame, is not the absence of logic but the pre-verbal, pre-empirical synthesis of what the psyche knows but cannot yet articulate.

This faculty operates through:

• Unconscious pattern recognition.
• Emotionally encoded symbolic association.
• Imaginative extrapolation from fragments.
• Somatic and energetic “knowing”.

Many individuals with FMS—particularly those within the vivid or mythopoetic spectrum—exhibit signs of precognitive imagination. They may recall events not yet experienced, foresee danger, or intuit emotional truths that later emerge as fact. While clinically puzzling, psychextrics reinterprets these as oracular flashes of the memory-intuition complex with the hypothalamus playing key role in its encoding.

Memory

As Sacred Recall

In ancestral traditions across Africa and the Diaspora, memory has never been solely individual. It is collective, ancestral, and spiritual. To remember is to re-member—to bring oneself back into harmony with the deeper self, the community, and the divine.

In this spiritual framing, memory is:

• A soul archive that holds not just events but karmic truths.
• A portal into transgenerational knowledge.
• A medium through which the ancestors whisper.
• A form of sacred witness to inner and outer realities.

Thus, when an individual “remembers” something that never happened in a physical sense, they may still be accessing a symbolic truth or archetypal narrative that reveals emotional or spiritual data.

The False Memory

As Intuitive Symbol

False memories—especially those rich in sensory or emotional detail—often operate more like dreams than lies. They are narrative glyphs written by the unconscious to convey:

• A wound.
• A fear.
• A longing.
• Or a sacred lesson.

In psychextrics terms, such memories are not errors of mind but gestures of the soul—constructs that encode emotional truth through mythic form. Like ancient oracles speaking in riddles, the memory says: “This is not what happened, but this is what hurts. This is not the fact, but this is the meaning.”

Understanding this allows therapists, spiritual guides, and the self to interpret false memory not as something to erase but as something to decode.

Neurotype

And the Oracular Spectrum

Certain neurotypes—especially those on the high-functioning autism or hyperphantasia spectrums—are more prone to:

• Vivid internal visuals.
• Dream-memory conflation.
• Emotional synesthesia.
• Predictive imagination.

These traits are also present in the artistic, mystic, or spiritual personalities of many cultures. In psychextrics, this profile is seen not as dysfunction but as oracular neurodivergence—an evolutionary faculty for sacred pattern recognition.

People in this group often:

• Remember faces in perfect detail after a brief glance.
• Recall events with emotional embellishment that speaks to unmet needs.
• Conflate vision, dream, and reality in symbolic form.
• Experience déjà vu, precognition, or telepathic intuition.

Such individuals are not broken; they are sensitive instruments tuned to hidden frequencies.

The Ritual Mind:

Anchoring Intuition in Sacred Practice

The oracular memory needs a container—without it, it may spiral into delusion, anxiety, or narrative inflation. Through ritual, art, and community validation, oracular traits can be harnessed into wisdom.

Sacred practices that anchor this process include:

• Journaling dreams and memory symbols.
• Storytelling circles for emotional truth.
• Divinatory arts (e.g. Ifá, tarot, bones) as narrative interpretation tools.

• Somatic rituals that embody memory through gesture and movement.
• Psychextrics therapy that validates symbolic memory while separating fact from fiction.

In traditional African cosmologies, these processes are already embedded in griotic wisdom, oracle consultation, and ancestral invocation. Psychextrics seeks to re-harmonise scientific understanding with spiritual tradition, creating a model in which memory distortion becomes memory revelation.

Ethical Stewardship

Of the Inner Oracle

Those who carry oracular memory traits must be ethically supported. Without grounding, they may:

• Be exploited for their insight.
• Be disbelieved and stigmatised.
• Turn their gifts inward as pathology.
• Confuse sacred knowing with infallibility.

Ethical frameworks include:

• Teaching discernment between symbolic and literal memory.
• Creating safe spaces for sacred storytelling.
• Guarding against projection and guru complexes.
• Honouring the line between gift and responsibility.

Remembering

The Inner Temple

The oracle within is not an aberration—it is the oldest voice in the psyche, the ancestral witness that never sleeps. Through false memory, dream-symbol, intuitive flash, or artistic vision, it calls the individual back to wholeness.

What the world calls false, the soul may call a hidden truth.

What psychology calls delusion, spirit may name revelation.

When understood through psychextrics frameworks, memory becomes more than recall—it becomes a sacred map, leading the self toward healing, knowing, and destiny.

To honour the oracle within is not to abandon science, but to expand it—into realms where memory speaks with many tongues, and all are worth listening to.

THE FUTURE SELF AS HEALER: A PSYCHEXTRICS VISION BEYOND FMS

The journey through False Memory Syndrome (FMS) in psychextrics perspective does not end in correction—it culminates in transformation. The distortions that once seemed pathological are now re-understood as narrative phenomena, creative fragments, and emotional truths encoded in mnemonic symbols. What emerges from this recontextualisation is the concept of the Future Self—not merely a psychological ideal, but a healing archetype. One that actively participates in rewriting and redeeming the past.

This section outlines a forward-facing vision of healing, rooted in Psychextrics, where the future self is not an endpoint but a therapeutic agent. It acts as a narrator, a memory sculptor, a reconciler, and above all, a healer.

1. Healing in Reverse: Memory as a Future-Driven Construct:

Traditional memory theory suggests the past determines the present. Psychextrics reverses this: the future self can influence the narrative of the past. This is not mystical, but psychological and neuroplastic.

When individuals project a more empowered version of themselves into the future, they can:

• Recast traumatic memory in symbolic or redemptive form;
• Integrate false or fragmented memory into cohesive identity;
• Develop emotional distance from guilt or shame;
• Generate new neural pathways that favour coherence over chaos.

This process transforms memory from static record into narrative medicine—guided not by what was, but by what heals.

2. The Future Self as Archetypal Healer:

In psychextrics theory, the future self is not just an aspirational concept—it is an active psychic presence. It is the voice of inner wisdom, often heard in moments of clarity, intuition, and breakthrough. In those with FMS or vivid emotional memory distortion, the future self plays several crucial roles:

• The Re-Author: who revises stories with symbolic integrity.
• The Witness: who holds compassion for younger selves and broken timelines.
• The Guardian: who sets boundaries against emotional manipulation or suggestibility.
• The Artist: who creates myth, poetry, and visual representation from what was once confusion.

Through therapy, ritual, and imagination, the future self becomes accessible and present, not just as fantasy, but as a living orientation of mind.

3. Psychextrics Interventions to Activate the Future Self:

Therapeutic methods inspired by psychextrics include:

• Future Memory Journaling: writing memories as they would be remembered by a healed version of oneself.
• Sacred Timelining: mapping memory not chronologically, but according to emotional growth and symbolic lessons.
• Dialogues with the Future Self: through writing, role-play, or guided meditation.
• Mythical Rewriting: transforming traumatic or false memories into archetypal stories with spiritual or moral meaning.
• Future-Present Therapy Models: where therapy starts from the assumption that healing has already occurred, and the goal is to recover the self that knew how.

These tools empower individuals to become agents of their own narrative repair, replacing helplessness with authorship.

4. Collective Futures: Social Healing Through Memory Revision:

FMS is not only an individual phenomenon—it reflects wider social, familial, and cultural distortions. The same mechanisms that implant or sustain false memories—suggestibility, ideological framing, repetition, trauma—also shape collective identity.

The psychextrics model envisions a future where:

• Schools teach narrative literacy alongside factual accuracy.
• Courts recognise the emotive and symbolic weight of memory testimony.
• Therapists are trained in imaginative fluency to distinguish between metaphorical and literal memory.
• Social healing includes communal re-memory processes, truth-telling rituals, and cultural myth revision.

In this vision, societies begin to reimagine their pasts, not by erasing painful memories, but by restoring dignity to the meaning within them.

5. Neurodivergence as the Future’s Design:

A profound theme throughout this book has been the linkage between FMS and traits common to neurodivergent populations—particularly those with high-functioning autism, hyperphantasia, and emotional synaesthesia. Far from being flaws, these cognitive architectures are increasingly revealed as futures of human evolution.

In psychextrics vision:

• The vivid mind is not an error but a mirror of multidimensionality.
• Memory fusion is not confusion but symbolic intuition.
• False memory is not falsehood but narrative surplus.
• And the future self is not invention but embodied direction.

As society grows to embrace divergent modes of perception, memory, and creativity, the formerly “syndromic” may become catalysts for healing.

6. Memory’s Final Revelation: Becoming the Oracle:

This book has journeyed from pathology to potential, from error to art. At its conclusion stands the individual—not as patient, but as oracle. Not because they know the past with perfect accuracy, but because they have learned to feel truth across time.

The future self becomes the keeper of sacred memory:

• Able to extract wisdom from distortion.
• To reclaim symbols from shame.
• To forgive what was, and reimagine what must be.

This is post-traumatic growth reframed through the psychextrics lens—not just survival, but prophecy born of memory.

The Psychextrics Age

Of Memory

We are entering a new epoch. One in which memory is not judged solely by its factuality, but by its capacity to heal, anchor, and inspire. Where memory is not an archive, but a palette. Where the future self guides the hand that paints it.

False Memory Syndrome is not the final word. It is the threshold.

Beyond it lies a new understanding of what it means to remember, to imagine, and to be whole.

The future self waits—not ahead, but within.

CONCLUSION

MEMORY SOVEREIGNTY AND THE FUTURE OF PSYCHEXTRICS

Reclaiming the Inner Archive

As we conclude this exploration of False Memory Syndrome through the lens of psychextrics, we arrive at a critical frontier—memory sovereignty: the inherent right and responsibility of every individual to govern their own inner archive of remembered, misremembered, imagined, and felt experience.

In a world where memory is shaped by suggestion, media saturation, trauma, ideology, and even therapeutic intervention, this sovereignty is constantly under siege. But in psychextrics, we affirm a new paradigm—one where memory is not only a faculty but a jurisdiction; not merely a function of the brain but a territory of the soul, to be navigated with agency, care, and reverence.

The End

Of Passive Memory

Traditionally, memory has been viewed as passive: we are thought to receive, store, and recall. But this is an illusion. Memory is active, political, and participatory. Every act of remembering is also an act of construction—guided by emotional colour, selective attention, neurotype, and narrative need.

Psychextrics reframes the individual as a sovereign memory-being—one who must reclaim the right to:

• Question their memories without shame.
• Explore the origins of their inner narratives.
• Separate truth from symbolic truth.
• Choose which memories to preserve, reframe, or release.
• Guard against intrusion, coercion, and manipulation.

Memory sovereignty is not about absolute accuracy; it is about authentic authorship of the inner self.

False Memory,

True Self

One of the most profound insights of this study is that false memory does not mean false self. Individuals with FMS may carry invented or distorted recollections, but these memories emerge from real emotional needs, unmet longings, psychological gaps, or neurocognitive adaptations.

In psychextrics thought, false memory becomes a mythopoetic bridge—a construction that tries to make meaning where trauma has left blanks, where reality has been too harsh to hold, or where the creative mind has outrun the factual world. These mythic insertions should not be shamed. They should be understood, translated, and where necessary, gently revised.

The future of healing is not about forcing memory to conform to fact, but helping the psyche find coherence, continuity, and compassion—even in fiction.

The Psychextrics Practitioner

As Memory Steward

As we move into an era of advanced neuro-interventions, AI-generated memories, virtual experiences, and digital dream archives, the role of the therapist, priest-healer, or psychextrics guide evolves. They are no longer just diagnosticians. They become memory stewards—guardians of ethical narrative formation.

Such a steward must:

• Honour the emotional truths behind memory distortions.
• Respect the identity functions that memories serve.
• Avoid imposing their own interpretations on the client’s inner world.
• Use creative tools (art, language, ritual, dreamwork) to support constructive recollection.
• Facilitate sovereignty, not dependence.

The Future

Of Psychextrics

As a new behavioural science, psychextrics will continue to evolve. Its applications in diagnosing, supporting, and empowering individuals with FMS—and related neuro-emotive conditions—open new frontiers for psychology, neuroscience, art therapy, and social justice.

Future directions may include:

• Genome-to-memory mapping: identifying links between neurotypes and specific memory vulnerabilities or strengths.
• AI-assisted memory reconstruction: using ethical machine learning to help individuals reconstruct coherent narratives from fragmented or manipulated experiences.
• Psychextrics rites of passage: blending ancestral rituals with neuro-cognitive science to facilitate memory anchoring and emotional healing.

Through these developments, psychextrics affirms a sacred truth: memory is not a liability to be corrected, but a spiritual faculty to be nurtured.

From Syndrome

To Sovereignty

False Memory Syndrome is not merely a clinical problem—it is a human challenge that touches the very nature of perception, identity, and story. By placing FMS within the psychextrics framework, we no longer reduce it to error or pathology. We see it instead as part of the spectrum of creative cognition—capable of both confusion and revelation.

To those living with FMS: you are not broken. You are memory-beings with extraordinary imaginative power. The task is not to purge the untrue, but to understand what your memories are trying to protect, express, or make whole.

To the healers and practitioners: your responsibility is profound. You are not simply treating a syndrome—you are holding the sacred architecture of someone’s soul. Do so with humility, integrity, and awe.

To the world: let us build systems—legal, educational, therapeutic—that do not punish people for how they remember, but help them transform remembrance into wisdom.

For in the end, the future of memory is not about the past. It is about becoming whole.

REFERENCE

1. Loftus, E. F., & Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25(12), 720–725. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19951201-07
2. Kasama, T., Kataoka, M., Kawaguchi, M., Nishikawa, K., Inoue, Y., Ikegaya, Y., & Matsumoto, N. (2022). Modulation of corticotropin-releasing factor in the hypothalamus alters the formation of false contextual fear memories in mice. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 904061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.904061
3. Vann, S. D., Aggleton, J. P., & Maguire, E. A. (2013). What does the anterior thalamic nuclei contribute to spatial memory? Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7, 45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00045
4. de Quervain, D. J., Aerni, A., & Roozendaal, B. (2008). Glucocorticoid effects on memory retrieval: Clinical relevance for human psychopathology and treatment. Behavioural Neuroscience, 122(6), 1391–1406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013593
5. Wikipedia contributors. (2025, February 1). Mammillothalamic tract. In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammillothalamic_tract
6. Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Ghosal S, Kopp B, Wulsin A, Makinson R, Scheimann J, Myers B. Regulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Stress Response. Compr Physiol. 2016 Mar 15;6(2):603-21. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c150015. PMID: 27065163; PMCID: PMC4867107.
7. Vann SD, Nelson AJ. The mammillary bodies and memory: more than a hippocampal relay. Prog Brain Res. 2015;219:163-85. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 16. PMID: 26072239; PMCID: PMC4498492.
8. Nelson AJD. The anterior thalamic nuclei and cognition: A role beyond space? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jul;126:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.047. Epub 2021 Mar 15. PMID: 33737105; PMCID: PMC8363507.
9. Kasama E, Moriya M, Kamimura R, Matsuki T, Seki K. Formation of False Context Fear Memory Is Regulated by Hypothalamic Corticotropin-Releasing Factor in Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 3;23(11):6286. doi: 10.3390/ijms23116286. PMID: 35682965; PMCID: PMC9181353.
10. Susanne Vogel & Lars Schwabe, Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom, Published: 29 June 2016. Web: https://www.nature.com/articles/npjscilearn201611. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11. Shareable link: https://rdcu.be/ez8F6
11. Christopher M. Dillingham, Aura Frizzati, Andrew J.D. Nelson, Seralynne D.Vann [July 2015] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.07.025
12. Lívea Dornela Godoy;Matheus Teixeira Rossignoli;Polianna Delfino-Pereira; Norberto Garcia-Cairasco;Eduardo Henrique de Lima Umeoka. A Comprehensive Overview on Stress Neurobiology: Basic Concepts and Clinical Implications, 03 July 2018. Volume 12 – 2018 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00127
13. Lentoor AG. Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying false memories: misinformation, distortion or erroneous configuration? AIMS Neurosci. 2023 Sep 7;10(3):255-268. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023020. PMID: 37841346; PMCID: PMC10567586.
14. Peterson DC, Reddy V, Mayes DA. Neuroanatomy, Mammillary Bodies. [Updated 2023 Aug 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537192/
15. Vann, Seralynne. D., & Aggleton, John. P. (2004). The mammillary bodies: Two memory systems in one? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1299
16. Catherine M. Sweeney-Reed; Lars Buentjen; Jürgen Voges; Friedhelm C. Schmitt; Tino Zaehle; Julia W.Y. Kam; Jörn Kaufmann; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Hermann Hinrichs; Robert T. Knight; Michael D. Rugg. The role of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus in human memory processing. July 2021.
17. Giulio Pergola; Lola Danet; Anne-Lise Pitel; Giovanni A. Carlesimo; Shailendra Segobin; Jérémie Pariente; Boris Suchan; Anna S. Mitchell; Emmanuel J. Barbeau. The Regulatory Role of the Human Mediodorsal Thalamus. November 2018
18. Pergola, Giulio, Ranft, Alexander, Mathias, Klaus, Suchan, Boris. The role of the thalamic nuclei in recognition memory accompanied by recall during encoding and retrieval: An fMRI study. 2013/02/19.
19. Tom Smeets, Henry Otgaar, Ingrid Candel, Oliver T. Wolf,. True or false? Memory is differentially affected by stress-induced cortisol elevations and sympathetic activity at consolidation and retrieval, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Volume 33, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1378-1386, ISSN 0306-4530, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.009. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645300800190X)